Be The Castle | 스마TV
내용
[subtitle-meta] lang=en auto=True
Hello, I will accept 20 points. If I were to point out the single most important aspect of online marketing,
I would say keyword analysis. This is
because no matter what marketing actions we take—for example, SLS experience groups,
YouTube marketing, or ads—
the probability that customers will ultimately judge and decide on us through search is very high. That is why many
YouTubers and Smart Talk instructors emphasize the importance of analyzing keywords and
finding specific sub-keywords. The
core point they both make is about competition intensity.
However, in my opinion, competition intensity is far too
insufficient as data to look at for achieving top search rankings.
In particular, it has two drawbacks, so I believe it is quite difficult to
discover keywords that generate sufficient sales or create a successful business if you rely solely on this.
Therefore, today I would like to
introduce you to the concept of "Shoe Tong Keyword" and the Keyword Planner, which can complement the shortcomings of competition intensity. I am confident that if
you watch the following video, you will be able to completely resolve the frustration you felt regarding how to
source products and discover keywords while only looking at competition intensity.
So, let's move on to constraint and likes. I would appreciate it if you could watch until the end, Madam.
Many YouTubers and instructors are introducing the concept of organizing competition as if it were the standard, going head-to-head with Shin Saimdang.
However, if you look closely, you can see that structurally, unless these two shortcomings are compensated for, it is
not a very attractive metric.
First, let me explain starting from the first month.
Competition intensity includes too many 5 math elements.
In other words, our competitors are products that are on the first page, have been listed well for 6 months to a year, and are generating
sales while possessing the latest scores.
However, if you look at the level of competition, every product from the first page to the subsequent pages has been included, making it a situation where
people are competing against each other.
Therefore, if sales are not coming in right now, we
must analyze all of these products—sometimes tens of thousands of items—as our competitors. In
this case, if you analyze based solely on numbers regarding competition intensity, you might miss a
crucial point: you could
regret missing products with low originality scores, weak keyword or detail page analysis, or keywords that are dominating the top.
Therefore... Therefore, you should not judge based solely on these numbers. Also, if the
level of competition seems very high and attractive, there is a high
probability that if you enter, the search volume will be low or it will be a short-term adult event. In
such cases, you might be hesitant to list the product, and by the time you register it, the trend has already ended, so it is often
not a trending topic.
So, when I look through the people who ask me about keyword analysis,
most say that instructors tell them to analyze keywords and
talk a lot about competition intensity. They use expressions like "look at sandals" or "look at variety shows," but
this is not correct.
If you calculate by just tasting the competition intensity and adding a few "flavoring" issues, there are definitely limitations in finding the keywords that require direct investment—the time we invest in our
business—and the keywords we truly need to invest in to achieve our specific goals. Now, let me
tell you about the second disadvantage.
This competition intensity is warm from her perspective. It does
not tell you whether the keyword will rise or fall in the future.
Even if it is a keyword you shouldn't enter right now because the competition intensity is high, factors like the number of product registrations or... even if you raise it...
Lord Jesus's To use an analogy, you cannot tell whether the
competition rate will decrease in the future or if the number of entries will increase significantly, or if
the market itself is growing despite the fierce competition right now.
Because the explanation only points out specific, decisive moments, it is
data that makes it impossible to predict the timing—even a week or so after we have to register and upload our products.
In other words, because the data is unpredictable, when looking at the intensity of competition, it is
difficult to say that we have discovered a stable keyword or honed a keyword with potential.
Of course, there are people who register based solely on that and make money, but I
consider them a very small minority.
Today, I want to tell you something. I share various
keyword analysis methods and know-how with
many people every Thursday night at 10 PM.
In fact, through these methods, there are many people who have achieved not only Power but also B Power, and many people
send me PCs during my broadcasts to verify that they have succeeded and their
sales have increased significantly. When
I first planned this, I
analyzed it logically with my own head and thought it was an opportunity, but I was not certain that it would work out in practice. Okay,
but I
believe this method has been verified through the countless people who are posting using 'Baechu' while watching his broadcast.
Among them, there are two things I want to share with you today: the concept of "good keywords" and the
concept of a "keyword planner." I
originally planned to explain these to you individually, but I will just explain them all at once.
Since I am not a perfect marketer myself, I am constantly working on the methodology I created and
deliberating on it in English.
Today, I will tell you about what has been verified.
So, let's look at the materials and I will explain. The
reason we analyze keywords is simple:
to achieve top rankings.
That is why many people attend training,
use various programs, sell furniture, and do all sorts of other things to achieve top rankings on Smart To.
So, instead of trying to follow and learn all those logics, I believe there are definitely certain rules that
Naver will never change. I thought that
creating my own theory based on those rules is the best way to achieve stable top rankings. There
are two things on Naver that never change that give you an advantage in top rankings. This is because it seems to be
related to the latest registered products, right?
And the second is products with high sales volume. I believe that "products go to top search rankings"—these
two factors are absolute, immutable principles that Smart Store will likely never change in the future. It is
simple: if you register recently and sell a lot, you will achieve top rankings.
However, I wondered why we are unable to do this. I started thinking from that point. You all
know that keyboard search volume is driven by "Suyuk" (sweet pork). I
considered how analyzing this demand pattern would allow us to maximize our recency score and easily secure sales volume bonuses without any financial burden. If you
look at the points where most people register products, I noticed that they do so around the time a "
Season 2" begins or when people start looking for items they wear. However, when I
analyzed the pattern where active search for a product or keyword stops once keyboard IP site lookups start, I discovered a "
life curve" for these keywords. I
thought that by identifying and utilizing this curve, we might discover principles for maximizing recency and easily registering sales volume. So, I
divided this keyword life cycle into two parts. If we look at
how it turns out, the "
Suyuk" keyword... It came out as a whole. I am
providing keywords that show patterns where the keyboard church rises or falls due to issues such as short-term tangles, trending topics, seasonal topics, and event-related matters. I will
explain long-term keywords later. After researching, I found that while it is
difficult to target "Dragon" and "Empty" keywords,
anyone can easily target "Communication" keywords. For example, let's
look at "Season 2 Halloween." If it is
Halloween, if we accurately identify the timing when search volume appears for Hallyu costumes and Halloween event props,
we can register here when others are registering.
What is good about that? If you register here, competitors have almost no sales volume,
so it is
good for building sales and scores. In other words, it is a
point where you can easily obtain the latest trends and sales volume scores. If you register without proper planning, you will end up
lacking the latest score later.
The key is to find the appropriate point and register the product.
So, to explain this keyword analysis more simply,
there is a first stage called the "Introduction Phase."
During this time, searches for specific keywords begin. When searched, people
explain "Halloween" and "Open." Let's take a look. People eagerly awaiting Halloween
will likely search for new Halloween items, products, or event props. These early adopters, who have been waiting for this, will see their
search volume start to rise relatively early. If you
can gauge when this search volume surges, you can get a sense of when to register your product to
maximize your sales and revenue scores. This is the
growth phase; if you enter at this stage, you will climb higher, and
competition will intensify. The
competition rate will rise. Then, what needs to be done? Advertising
or purchasing is necessary so that we can survive and
maximize
sales during this peak moment. The key point here is the current trend. At this stage, you need to
quickly clear inventory. Because this is a seasonal, trending, and buzz-driven trend, if you wait until then, you have to
wait a year. Your
money gets tied up for a whole year. Therefore, we need to register products at this time,
make money, and then start
preparing to slowly clear out our inventory. That is the structure I see.
Now we understand what a short cube is.
So, this... You need to find "2-second turn" keywords. You can do this by
visiting "20 Marketing Nap," which I created. There, the
keyword search program is free; you
just need to perform a search to find them. So, if you determine that the keyword you want in your desired category is a "suitable
keyword" or a "symbiotic keyword," you should
start registering that product without paying 20 elsewhere. As
I mentioned regarding upcoming events,
I host a live stream every Thursday at 10 PM, and many people find and receive "Gold" keywords there.
If you watch, you'll see people generating sales with the keywords they receive, achieving success, and discovering them themselves. As a result,
many "Power B" users are emerging.
Therefore, if you clearly understand this concept,
you can go straight to "20 Marketing" and discover keywords in the Goli keyword category. However, if you find
this difficult—if you don't understand what this means, or if you don't get the graphs,
introduction phase, growth phase, etc.—you can come to my live
stream to ask questions, or if you provide me with your category, I
will analyze it for you right on the spot. You can
then verify it. Now, once the "2-second turn" keyword has been identified, if you type it in...
So, where do we need to move on? Since I'm
teaching you how to utilize Gold Keywords, I've noticed that
many people just glance at the keywords without actually reading them. However, the important thing is that you must take notes on them and track them. This is because the
rankings of Gold Keywords fluctuate frequently, so if you don't keep a good record, you
often won't remember which keywords you were closely watching. For instance, there might be "
Major Issues" or "Machine," or during the
year-end and New Year holidays,
there are keywords like "New Year's Resolutions That Last Three Days"—the "Top 21." You need to write down every single one of these keywords whenever you track the corresponding keyboards.
Once you have written down all these keywords and categorized them to see if they are trending upwards or downwards, you can set up the keywords that are exactly where you will invest money to purchase inventory
or register products. If you
continue registering and studying this throughout February, March, and April, you
can check whether a keyword is trending upwards and allowing you to track its tone just by looking at the graph. Also, because you have already checked the "cautionary shoes" in advance, you can,
especially regarding consignment or overseas... For those doing purchasing agency work, this
serves as a kind of planner that allows you to capture all the important points without missing anything.
If you create this planner based on short-term keywords,
you won't need to worry about what to register or what products to source every month. There are
so many products to source in January, February, March, and April; you have to register them quickly because if you
leave them alone, the nights will grab them. So, from now on, once you
understand the concept of a planner—even if it stands out as a "short-term keyword"—you wo
n't ask questions like, "What should I announce?" or "What should I source?" Instead, you will start
asking more detailed questions like, "The keyword is trending upwards, should I really use it as a goal keyword? When will it take off?"
So far, I have explained short-term keywords and keyword planners. You might wonder what
this person is talking about or if you can really get high
exposure with this, but I am not selling you any programs,
secret methods,
or things only I know. I am not selling any kind of hacking. I am
explaining analysis methods and how to use them to identify savings products suitable for you, and
I am providing consulting on that.
Thank you for watching the video so far. My channel is run thanks to the power of your subscriptions and likes. Please make
sure to subscribe and support me. Thank you.
원문 자막 펼치기
WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:00.060 --> 00:00:04.940 align:start position:0% Hello, <00:00:00.296><c>I </c><00:00:00.532><c>will </c><00:00:00.768><c>accept </c><00:00:01.004><c>20 </c><00:00:01.240><c>points. </c><00:00:01.476><c>If </c><00:00:01.712><c>I </c><00:00:01.948><c>were </c><00:00:02.184><c>to </c><00:00:02.420><c>point </c><00:00:02.656><c>out </c><00:00:02.892><c>the </c><00:00:03.128><c>single </c><00:00:03.364><c>most </c><00:00:03.600><c>important </c><00:00:03.836><c>aspect </c><00:00:04.072><c>of </c><00:00:04.308><c>online </c><00:00:04.544><c>marketing,</c> 00:00:04.940 --> 00:00:04.950 align:start position:0% Hello, I will accept 20 points. If I were to point out the single most important aspect of online marketing, 00:00:04.950 --> 00:00:09.259 align:start position:0% Hello, I will accept 20 points. If I were to point out the single most important aspect of online marketing, I <00:00:05.444><c>would </c><00:00:05.938><c>say </c><00:00:06.432><c>keyword </c><00:00:06.926><c>analysis. </c><00:00:07.420><c>This </c><00:00:07.914><c>is</c> 00:00:09.259 --> 00:00:09.269 align:start position:0% I would say keyword analysis. This is 00:00:09.269 --> 00:00:14.390 align:start position:0% I would say keyword analysis. This is because <00:00:09.664><c>no </c><00:00:10.059><c>matter </c><00:00:10.454><c>what </c><00:00:10.849><c>marketing </c><00:00:11.244><c>actions </c><00:00:11.639><c>we </c><00:00:12.034><c>take—for </c><00:00:12.429><c>example, </c><00:00:12.824><c>SLS </c><00:00:13.219><c>experience </c><00:00:13.614><c>groups,</c> 00:00:14.390 --> 00:00:14.400 align:start position:0% because no matter what marketing actions we take—for example, SLS experience groups, 00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:20.960 align:start position:0% because no matter what marketing actions we take—for example, SLS experience groups, YouTube <00:00:16.260><c>marketing, </c><00:00:18.120><c>or </c><00:00:19.980><c>ads—</c> 00:00:20.960 --> 00:00:20.970 align:start position:0% YouTube marketing, or ads— 00:00:20.970 --> 00:00:26.720 align:start position:0% YouTube marketing, or ads— the <00:00:21.254><c>probability </c><00:00:21.538><c>that </c><00:00:21.822><c>customers </c><00:00:22.106><c>will </c><00:00:22.390><c>ultimately </c><00:00:22.674><c>judge </c><00:00:22.958><c>and </c><00:00:23.242><c>decide </c><00:00:23.526><c>on </c><00:00:23.810><c>us </c><00:00:24.094><c>through </c><00:00:24.378><c>search </c><00:00:24.662><c>is </c><00:00:24.946><c>very </c><00:00:25.230><c>high. </c><00:00:25.514><c>That </c><00:00:25.798><c>is </c><00:00:26.082><c>why </c><00:00:26.366><c>many</c> 00:00:26.720 --> 00:00:26.730 align:start position:0% the probability that customers will ultimately judge and decide on us through search is very high. That is why many 00:00:26.730 --> 00:00:30.380 align:start position:0% the probability that customers will ultimately judge and decide on us through search is very high. That is why many YouTubers <00:00:27.008><c>and </c><00:00:27.286><c>Smart </c><00:00:27.564><c>Talk </c><00:00:27.842><c>instructors </c><00:00:28.120><c>emphasize </c><00:00:28.398><c>the </c><00:00:28.676><c>importance </c><00:00:28.954><c>of </c><00:00:29.232><c>analyzing </c><00:00:29.510><c>keywords </c><00:00:29.788><c>and</c> 00:00:30.380 --> 00:00:30.390 align:start position:0% YouTubers and Smart Talk instructors emphasize the importance of analyzing keywords and 00:00:30.390 --> 00:00:34.760 align:start position:0% YouTubers and Smart Talk instructors emphasize the importance of analyzing keywords and finding <00:00:31.529><c>specific </c><00:00:32.668><c>sub-keywords. </c><00:00:33.807><c>The</c> 00:00:34.760 --> 00:00:34.770 align:start position:0% finding specific sub-keywords. The 00:00:34.770 --> 00:00:39.920 align:start position:0% finding specific sub-keywords. The core <00:00:35.298><c>point </c><00:00:35.826><c>they </c><00:00:36.354><c>both </c><00:00:36.882><c>make </c><00:00:37.410><c>is </c><00:00:37.938><c>about </c><00:00:38.466><c>competition </c><00:00:38.994><c>intensity.</c> 00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:39.930 align:start position:0% core point they both make is about competition intensity. 00:00:39.930 --> 00:00:44.979 align:start position:0% core point they both make is about competition intensity. However, <00:00:40.485><c>in </c><00:00:41.040><c>my </c><00:00:41.595><c>opinion, </c><00:00:42.150><c>competition </c><00:00:42.705><c>intensity </c><00:00:43.260><c>is </c><00:00:43.815><c>far </c><00:00:44.370><c>too</c> 00:00:44.979 --> 00:00:44.989 align:start position:0% However, in my opinion, competition intensity is far too 00:00:44.989 --> 00:00:48.830 align:start position:0% However, in my opinion, competition intensity is far too insufficient <00:00:45.254><c>as </c><00:00:45.519><c>data </c><00:00:45.784><c>to </c><00:00:46.049><c>look </c><00:00:46.314><c>at </c><00:00:46.579><c>for </c><00:00:46.844><c>achieving </c><00:00:47.109><c>top </c><00:00:47.374><c>search </c><00:00:47.639><c>rankings.</c> 00:00:48.830 --> 00:00:48.840 align:start position:0% insufficient as data to look at for achieving top search rankings. 00:00:48.840 --> 00:00:54.260 align:start position:0% insufficient as data to look at for achieving top search rankings. In <00:00:49.230><c>particular, </c><00:00:49.620><c>it </c><00:00:50.010><c>has </c><00:00:50.400><c>two </c><00:00:50.790><c>drawbacks, </c><00:00:51.180><c>so </c><00:00:51.570><c>I </c><00:00:51.960><c>believe </c><00:00:52.350><c>it </c><00:00:52.740><c>is </c><00:00:53.130><c>quite </c><00:00:53.520><c>difficult </c><00:00:53.910><c>to</c> 00:00:54.260 --> 00:00:54.270 align:start position:0% In particular, it has two drawbacks, so I believe it is quite difficult to 00:00:54.270 --> 00:00:58.490 align:start position:0% In particular, it has two drawbacks, so I believe it is quite difficult to discover <00:00:54.517><c>keywords </c><00:00:54.764><c>that </c><00:00:55.011><c>generate </c><00:00:55.258><c>sufficient </c><00:00:55.505><c>sales </c><00:00:55.752><c>or </c><00:00:55.999><c>create </c><00:00:56.246><c>a </c><00:00:56.493><c>successful </c><00:00:56.740><c>business </c><00:00:56.987><c>if </c><00:00:57.234><c>you </c><00:00:57.481><c>rely </c><00:00:57.728><c>solely </c><00:00:57.975><c>on </c><00:00:58.222><c>this.</c> 00:00:58.490 --> 00:01:01.549 align:start position:0% discover keywords that generate sufficient sales or create a successful business if you rely solely on this. 00:01:01.549 --> 00:01:01.559 align:start position:0% 00:01:01.559 --> 00:01:06.350 align:start position:0% Therefore, <00:01:02.477><c>today </c><00:01:03.395><c>I </c><00:01:04.313><c>would </c><00:01:05.231><c>like </c><00:01:06.149><c>to</c> 00:01:06.350 --> 00:01:06.360 align:start position:0% Therefore, today I would like to 00:01:06.360 --> 00:01:10.969 align:start position:0% Therefore, today I would like to introduce <00:01:06.510><c>you </c><00:01:06.660><c>to </c><00:01:06.810><c>the </c><00:01:06.960><c>concept </c><00:01:07.110><c>of </c><00:01:07.260><c>"Shoe </c><00:01:07.410><c>Tong </c><00:01:07.560><c>Keyword" </c><00:01:07.710><c>and </c><00:01:07.860><c>the </c><00:01:08.010><c>Keyword </c><00:01:08.160><c>Planner, </c><00:01:08.310><c>which </c><00:01:08.460><c>can </c><00:01:08.610><c>complement </c><00:01:08.760><c>the </c><00:01:08.910><c>shortcomings </c><00:01:09.060><c>of </c><00:01:09.210><c>competition </c><00:01:09.360><c>intensity. </c><00:01:09.510><c>I </c><00:01:09.660><c>am </c><00:01:09.810><c>confident </c><00:01:09.960><c>that </c><00:01:10.110><c>if</c> 00:01:10.969 --> 00:01:10.979 align:start position:0% introduce you to the concept of "Shoe Tong Keyword" and the Keyword Planner, which can complement the shortcomings of competition intensity. I am confident that if 00:01:10.979 --> 00:01:16.190 align:start position:0% introduce you to the concept of "Shoe Tong Keyword" and the Keyword Planner, which can complement the shortcomings of competition intensity. I am confident that if you <00:01:11.249><c>watch </c><00:01:11.519><c>the </c><00:01:11.789><c>following </c><00:01:12.059><c>video, </c><00:01:12.329><c>you </c><00:01:12.599><c>will </c><00:01:12.869><c>be </c><00:01:13.139><c>able </c><00:01:13.409><c>to </c><00:01:13.679><c>completely </c><00:01:13.949><c>resolve </c><00:01:14.219><c>the </c><00:01:14.489><c>frustration </c><00:01:14.759><c>you </c><00:01:15.029><c>felt </c><00:01:15.299><c>regarding </c><00:01:15.569><c>how </c><00:01:15.839><c>to</c> 00:01:16.190 --> 00:01:16.200 align:start position:0% you watch the following video, you will be able to completely resolve the frustration you felt regarding how to 00:01:16.200 --> 00:01:21.170 align:start position:0% you watch the following video, you will be able to completely resolve the frustration you felt regarding how to source <00:01:16.632><c>products </c><00:01:17.064><c>and </c><00:01:17.496><c>discover </c><00:01:17.928><c>keywords </c><00:01:18.360><c>while </c><00:01:18.792><c>only </c><00:01:19.224><c>looking </c><00:01:19.656><c>at </c><00:01:20.088><c>competition </c><00:01:20.520><c>intensity.</c> 00:01:21.170 --> 00:01:24.230 align:start position:0% source products and discover keywords while only looking at competition intensity. 00:01:24.230 --> 00:01:24.240 align:start position:0% 00:01:24.240 --> 00:01:29.749 align:start position:0% So, <00:01:24.431><c>let's </c><00:01:24.622><c>move </c><00:01:24.813><c>on </c><00:01:25.004><c>to </c><00:01:25.195><c>constraint </c><00:01:25.386><c>and </c><00:01:25.577><c>likes. </c><00:01:25.768><c>I </c><00:01:25.959><c>would </c><00:01:26.150><c>appreciate </c><00:01:26.341><c>it </c><00:01:26.532><c>if </c><00:01:26.723><c>you </c><00:01:26.914><c>could </c><00:01:27.105><c>watch </c><00:01:27.296><c>until </c><00:01:27.487><c>the </c><00:01:27.678><c>end, </c><00:01:27.869><c>Madam.</c> 00:01:29.749 --> 00:01:29.759 align:start position:0% So, let's move on to constraint and likes. I would appreciate it if you could watch until the end, Madam. 00:01:29.759 --> 00:01:34.130 align:start position:0% So, let's move on to constraint and likes. I would appreciate it if you could watch until the end, Madam. Many <00:01:29.956><c>YouTubers </c><00:01:30.153><c>and </c><00:01:30.350><c>instructors </c><00:01:30.547><c>are </c><00:01:30.744><c>introducing </c><00:01:30.941><c>the </c><00:01:31.138><c>concept </c><00:01:31.335><c>of </c><00:01:31.532><c>organizing </c><00:01:31.729><c>competition </c><00:01:31.926><c>as </c><00:01:32.123><c>if </c><00:01:32.320><c>it </c><00:01:32.517><c>were </c><00:01:32.714><c>the </c><00:01:32.911><c>standard, </c><00:01:33.108><c>going </c><00:01:33.305><c>head-to-head </c><00:01:33.502><c>with </c><00:01:33.699><c>Shin </c><00:01:33.896><c>Saimdang.</c> 00:01:34.130 --> 00:01:38.569 align:start position:0% Many YouTubers and instructors are introducing the concept of organizing competition as if it were the standard, going head-to-head with Shin Saimdang. 00:01:38.569 --> 00:01:38.579 align:start position:0% 00:01:38.579 --> 00:01:43.460 align:start position:0% However, <00:01:38.832><c>if </c><00:01:39.085><c>you </c><00:01:39.338><c>look </c><00:01:39.591><c>closely, </c><00:01:39.844><c>you </c><00:01:40.097><c>can </c><00:01:40.350><c>see </c><00:01:40.603><c>that </c><00:01:40.856><c>structurally, </c><00:01:41.109><c>unless </c><00:01:41.362><c>these </c><00:01:41.615><c>two </c><00:01:41.868><c>shortcomings </c><00:01:42.121><c>are </c><00:01:42.374><c>compensated </c><00:01:42.627><c>for, </c><00:01:42.880><c>it </c><00:01:43.133><c>is</c> 00:01:43.460 --> 00:01:43.470 align:start position:0% However, if you look closely, you can see that structurally, unless these two shortcomings are compensated for, it is 00:01:43.470 --> 00:01:44.660 align:start position:0% However, if you look closely, you can see that structurally, unless these two shortcomings are compensated for, it is 00:01:44.660 --> 00:01:44.670 align:start position:0% 00:01:44.670 --> 00:01:48.350 align:start position:0% not <00:01:45.375><c>a </c><00:01:46.080><c>very </c><00:01:46.785><c>attractive </c><00:01:47.490><c>metric.</c> 00:01:48.350 --> 00:01:48.360 align:start position:0% not a very attractive metric. 00:01:48.360 --> 00:01:51.679 align:start position:0% not a very attractive metric. First, <00:01:48.637><c>let </c><00:01:48.914><c>me </c><00:01:49.191><c>explain </c><00:01:49.468><c>starting </c><00:01:49.745><c>from </c><00:01:50.022><c>the </c><00:01:50.299><c>first </c><00:01:50.576><c>month.</c> 00:01:51.679 --> 00:01:51.689 align:start position:0% First, let me explain starting from the first month. 00:01:51.689 --> 00:01:54.710 align:start position:0% First, let me explain starting from the first month. Competition <00:01:52.032><c>intensity </c><00:01:52.375><c>includes </c><00:01:52.718><c>too </c><00:01:53.061><c>many </c><00:01:53.404><c>5 </c><00:01:53.747><c>math </c><00:01:54.090><c>elements.</c> 00:01:54.710 --> 00:01:54.720 align:start position:0% Competition intensity includes too many 5 math elements. 00:01:54.720 --> 00:02:00.319 align:start position:0% Competition intensity includes too many 5 math elements. In <00:01:54.926><c>other </c><00:01:55.132><c>words, </c><00:01:55.338><c>our </c><00:01:55.544><c>competitors </c><00:01:55.750><c>are </c><00:01:55.956><c>products </c><00:01:56.162><c>that </c><00:01:56.368><c>are </c><00:01:56.574><c>on </c><00:01:56.780><c>the </c><00:01:56.986><c>first </c><00:01:57.192><c>page, </c><00:01:57.398><c>have </c><00:01:57.604><c>been </c><00:01:57.810><c>listed </c><00:01:58.016><c>well </c><00:01:58.222><c>for </c><00:01:58.428><c>6 </c><00:01:58.634><c>months </c><00:01:58.840><c>to </c><00:01:59.046><c>a </c><00:01:59.252><c>year, </c><00:01:59.458><c>and </c><00:01:59.664><c>are </c><00:01:59.870><c>generating</c> 00:02:00.319 --> 00:02:00.329 align:start position:0% In other words, our competitors are products that are on the first page, have been listed well for 6 months to a year, and are generating 00:02:00.329 --> 00:02:04.700 align:start position:0% In other words, our competitors are products that are on the first page, have been listed well for 6 months to a year, and are generating sales <00:02:01.121><c>while </c><00:02:01.913><c>possessing </c><00:02:02.705><c>the </c><00:02:03.497><c>latest </c><00:02:04.289><c>scores.</c> 00:02:04.700 --> 00:02:07.940 align:start position:0% sales while possessing the latest scores. 00:02:07.940 --> 00:02:07.950 align:start position:0% 00:02:07.950 --> 00:02:13.070 align:start position:0% However, <00:02:08.128><c>if </c><00:02:08.306><c>you </c><00:02:08.484><c>look </c><00:02:08.662><c>at </c><00:02:08.840><c>the </c><00:02:09.018><c>level </c><00:02:09.196><c>of </c><00:02:09.374><c>competition, </c><00:02:09.552><c>every </c><00:02:09.730><c>product </c><00:02:09.908><c>from </c><00:02:10.086><c>the </c><00:02:10.264><c>first </c><00:02:10.442><c>page </c><00:02:10.620><c>to </c><00:02:10.798><c>the </c><00:02:10.976><c>subsequent </c><00:02:11.154><c>pages </c><00:02:11.332><c>has </c><00:02:11.510><c>been </c><00:02:11.688><c>included, </c><00:02:11.866><c>making </c><00:02:12.044><c>it </c><00:02:12.222><c>a </c><00:02:12.400><c>situation </c><00:02:12.578><c>where</c> 00:02:13.070 --> 00:02:13.080 align:start position:0% However, if you look at the level of competition, every product from the first page to the subsequent pages has been included, making it a situation where 00:02:13.080 --> 00:02:15.290 align:start position:0% However, if you look at the level of competition, every product from the first page to the subsequent pages has been included, making it a situation where people <00:02:13.368><c>are </c><00:02:13.656><c>competing </c><00:02:13.944><c>against </c><00:02:14.232><c>each </c><00:02:14.520><c>other.</c> 00:02:15.290 --> 00:02:15.300 align:start position:0% people are competing against each other. 00:02:15.300 --> 00:02:20.750 align:start position:0% people are competing against each other. Therefore, <00:02:15.860><c>if </c><00:02:16.420><c>sales </c><00:02:16.980><c>are </c><00:02:17.540><c>not </c><00:02:18.100><c>coming </c><00:02:18.660><c>in </c><00:02:19.220><c>right </c><00:02:19.780><c>now, </c><00:02:20.340><c>we</c> 00:02:20.750 --> 00:02:20.760 align:start position:0% Therefore, if sales are not coming in right now, we 00:02:20.760 --> 00:02:24.440 align:start position:0% Therefore, if sales are not coming in right now, we must <00:02:20.983><c>analyze </c><00:02:21.206><c>all </c><00:02:21.429><c>of </c><00:02:21.652><c>these </c><00:02:21.875><c>products—sometimes </c><00:02:22.098><c>tens </c><00:02:22.321><c>of </c><00:02:22.544><c>thousands </c><00:02:22.767><c>of </c><00:02:22.990><c>items—as </c><00:02:23.213><c>our </c><00:02:23.436><c>competitors. </c><00:02:23.659><c>In</c> 00:02:24.440 --> 00:02:24.450 align:start position:0% must analyze all of these products—sometimes tens of thousands of items—as our competitors. In 00:02:24.450 --> 00:02:28.100 align:start position:0% must analyze all of these products—sometimes tens of thousands of items—as our competitors. In this <00:02:24.683><c>case, </c><00:02:24.916><c>if </c><00:02:25.149><c>you </c><00:02:25.382><c>analyze </c><00:02:25.615><c>based </c><00:02:25.848><c>solely </c><00:02:26.081><c>on </c><00:02:26.314><c>numbers </c><00:02:26.547><c>regarding </c><00:02:26.780><c>competition </c><00:02:27.013><c>intensity, </c><00:02:27.246><c>you </c><00:02:27.479><c>might </c><00:02:27.712><c>miss </c><00:02:27.945><c>a</c> 00:02:28.100 --> 00:02:28.110 align:start position:0% this case, if you analyze based solely on numbers regarding competition intensity, you might miss a 00:02:28.110 --> 00:02:30.259 align:start position:0% this case, if you analyze based solely on numbers regarding competition intensity, you might miss a crucial <00:02:28.550><c>point: </c><00:02:28.990><c>you </c><00:02:29.430><c>could</c> 00:02:30.259 --> 00:02:32.780 align:start position:0% crucial point: you could 00:02:32.780 --> 00:02:37.580 align:start position:0% 00:02:37.580 --> 00:02:37.590 align:start position:0% 00:02:37.590 --> 00:02:42.800 align:start position:0% regret <00:02:37.809><c>missing </c><00:02:38.028><c>products </c><00:02:38.247><c>with </c><00:02:38.466><c>low </c><00:02:38.685><c>originality </c><00:02:38.904><c>scores, </c><00:02:39.123><c>weak </c><00:02:39.342><c>keyword </c><00:02:39.561><c>or </c><00:02:39.780><c>detail </c><00:02:39.999><c>page </c><00:02:40.218><c>analysis, </c><00:02:40.437><c>or </c><00:02:40.656><c>keywords </c><00:02:40.875><c>that </c><00:02:41.094><c>are </c><00:02:41.313><c>dominating </c><00:02:41.532><c>the </c><00:02:41.751><c>top.</c> 00:02:42.800 --> 00:02:42.810 align:start position:0% regret missing products with low originality scores, weak keyword or detail page analysis, or keywords that are dominating the top. 00:02:42.810 --> 00:02:46.849 align:start position:0% regret missing products with low originality scores, weak keyword or detail page analysis, or keywords that are dominating the top. Therefore... <00:02:43.054><c>Therefore, </c><00:02:43.298><c>you </c><00:02:43.542><c>should </c><00:02:43.786><c>not </c><00:02:44.030><c>judge </c><00:02:44.274><c>based </c><00:02:44.518><c>solely </c><00:02:44.762><c>on </c><00:02:45.006><c>these </c><00:02:45.250><c>numbers. </c><00:02:45.494><c>Also, </c><00:02:45.738><c>if </c><00:02:45.982><c>the</c> 00:02:46.849 --> 00:02:46.859 align:start position:0% Therefore... Therefore, you should not judge based solely on these numbers. Also, if the 00:02:46.859 --> 00:02:51.050 align:start position:0% Therefore... Therefore, you should not judge based solely on these numbers. Also, if the level <00:02:47.208><c>of </c><00:02:47.557><c>competition </c><00:02:47.906><c>seems </c><00:02:48.255><c>very </c><00:02:48.604><c>high </c><00:02:48.953><c>and </c><00:02:49.302><c>attractive, </c><00:02:49.651><c>there </c><00:02:50.000><c>is </c><00:02:50.349><c>a </c><00:02:50.698><c>high</c> 00:02:51.050 --> 00:02:51.060 align:start position:0% level of competition seems very high and attractive, there is a high 00:02:51.060 --> 00:02:56.300 align:start position:0% level of competition seems very high and attractive, there is a high probability <00:02:51.298><c>that </c><00:02:51.536><c>if </c><00:02:51.774><c>you </c><00:02:52.012><c>enter, </c><00:02:52.250><c>the </c><00:02:52.488><c>search </c><00:02:52.726><c>volume </c><00:02:52.964><c>will </c><00:02:53.202><c>be </c><00:02:53.440><c>low </c><00:02:53.678><c>or </c><00:02:53.916><c>it </c><00:02:54.154><c>will </c><00:02:54.392><c>be </c><00:02:54.630><c>a </c><00:02:54.868><c>short-term </c><00:02:55.106><c>adult </c><00:02:55.344><c>event. </c><00:02:55.582><c>In</c> 00:02:56.300 --> 00:02:56.310 align:start position:0% probability that if you enter, the search volume will be low or it will be a short-term adult event. In 00:02:56.310 --> 00:02:57.349 align:start position:0% probability that if you enter, the search volume will be low or it will be a short-term adult event. In 00:02:57.349 --> 00:02:57.359 align:start position:0% 00:02:57.359 --> 00:03:02.599 align:start position:0% such <00:02:57.534><c>cases, </c><00:02:57.709><c>you </c><00:02:57.884><c>might </c><00:02:58.059><c>be </c><00:02:58.234><c>hesitant </c><00:02:58.409><c>to </c><00:02:58.584><c>list </c><00:02:58.759><c>the </c><00:02:58.934><c>product, </c><00:02:59.109><c>and </c><00:02:59.284><c>by </c><00:02:59.459><c>the </c><00:02:59.634><c>time </c><00:02:59.809><c>you </c><00:02:59.984><c>register </c><00:03:00.159><c>it, </c><00:03:00.334><c>the </c><00:03:00.509><c>trend </c><00:03:00.684><c>has </c><00:03:00.859><c>already </c><00:03:01.034><c>ended, </c><00:03:01.209><c>so </c><00:03:01.384><c>it </c><00:03:01.559><c>is </c><00:03:01.734><c>often</c> 00:03:02.599 --> 00:03:02.609 align:start position:0% such cases, you might be hesitant to list the product, and by the time you register it, the trend has already ended, so it is often 00:03:02.609 --> 00:03:06.500 align:start position:0% such cases, you might be hesitant to list the product, and by the time you register it, the trend has already ended, so it is often not <00:03:03.559><c>a </c><00:03:04.509><c>trending </c><00:03:05.459><c>topic.</c> 00:03:06.500 --> 00:03:06.510 align:start position:0% not a trending topic. 00:03:06.510 --> 00:03:10.819 align:start position:0% not a trending topic. So, <00:03:06.855><c>when </c><00:03:07.200><c>I </c><00:03:07.545><c>look </c><00:03:07.890><c>through </c><00:03:08.235><c>the </c><00:03:08.580><c>people </c><00:03:08.925><c>who </c><00:03:09.270><c>ask </c><00:03:09.615><c>me </c><00:03:09.960><c>about </c><00:03:10.305><c>keyword </c><00:03:10.650><c>analysis,</c> 00:03:10.819 --> 00:03:10.829 align:start position:0% So, when I look through the people who ask me about keyword analysis, 00:03:10.829 --> 00:03:16.159 align:start position:0% So, when I look through the people who ask me about keyword analysis, most <00:03:11.395><c>say </c><00:03:11.961><c>that </c><00:03:12.527><c>instructors </c><00:03:13.093><c>tell </c><00:03:13.659><c>them </c><00:03:14.225><c>to </c><00:03:14.791><c>analyze </c><00:03:15.357><c>keywords </c><00:03:15.923><c>and</c> 00:03:16.159 --> 00:03:16.169 align:start position:0% most say that instructors tell them to analyze keywords and 00:03:16.169 --> 00:03:21.229 align:start position:0% most say that instructors tell them to analyze keywords and talk <00:03:16.400><c>a </c><00:03:16.631><c>lot </c><00:03:16.862><c>about </c><00:03:17.093><c>competition </c><00:03:17.324><c>intensity. </c><00:03:17.555><c>They </c><00:03:17.786><c>use </c><00:03:18.017><c>expressions </c><00:03:18.248><c>like </c><00:03:18.479><c>"look </c><00:03:18.710><c>at </c><00:03:18.941><c>sandals" </c><00:03:19.172><c>or </c><00:03:19.403><c>"look </c><00:03:19.634><c>at </c><00:03:19.865><c>variety </c><00:03:20.096><c>shows," </c><00:03:20.327><c>but</c> 00:03:21.229 --> 00:03:21.239 align:start position:0% talk a lot about competition intensity. They use expressions like "look at sandals" or "look at variety shows," but 00:03:21.239 --> 00:03:25.099 align:start position:0% talk a lot about competition intensity. They use expressions like "look at sandals" or "look at variety shows," but this <00:03:22.319><c>is </c><00:03:23.399><c>not </c><00:03:24.479><c>correct.</c> 00:03:25.099 --> 00:03:29.420 align:start position:0% this is not correct. 00:03:29.420 --> 00:03:29.430 align:start position:0% 00:03:29.430 --> 00:03:34.069 align:start position:0% If <00:03:29.569><c>you </c><00:03:29.708><c>calculate </c><00:03:29.847><c>by </c><00:03:29.986><c>just </c><00:03:30.125><c>tasting </c><00:03:30.264><c>the </c><00:03:30.403><c>competition </c><00:03:30.542><c>intensity </c><00:03:30.681><c>and </c><00:03:30.820><c>adding </c><00:03:30.959><c>a </c><00:03:31.098><c>few </c><00:03:31.237><c>"flavoring" </c><00:03:31.376><c>issues, </c><00:03:31.515><c>there </c><00:03:31.654><c>are </c><00:03:31.793><c>definitely </c><00:03:31.932><c>limitations </c><00:03:32.071><c>in </c><00:03:32.210><c>finding </c><00:03:32.349><c>the </c><00:03:32.488><c>keywords </c><00:03:32.627><c>that </c><00:03:32.766><c>require </c><00:03:32.905><c>direct </c><00:03:33.044><c>investment—the </c><00:03:33.183><c>time </c><00:03:33.322><c>we </c><00:03:33.461><c>invest </c><00:03:33.600><c>in </c><00:03:33.739><c>our</c> 00:03:34.069 --> 00:03:34.079 align:start position:0% If you calculate by just tasting the competition intensity and adding a few "flavoring" issues, there are definitely limitations in finding the keywords that require direct investment—the time we invest in our 00:03:34.079 --> 00:03:39.319 align:start position:0% If you calculate by just tasting the competition intensity and adding a few "flavoring" issues, there are definitely limitations in finding the keywords that require direct investment—the time we invest in our business—and <00:03:34.358><c>the </c><00:03:34.637><c>keywords </c><00:03:34.916><c>we </c><00:03:35.195><c>truly </c><00:03:35.474><c>need </c><00:03:35.753><c>to </c><00:03:36.032><c>invest </c><00:03:36.311><c>in </c><00:03:36.590><c>to </c><00:03:36.869><c>achieve </c><00:03:37.148><c>our </c><00:03:37.427><c>specific </c><00:03:37.706><c>goals. </c><00:03:37.985><c>Now, </c><00:03:38.264><c>let </c><00:03:38.543><c>me</c> 00:03:39.319 --> 00:03:43.640 align:start position:0% business—and the keywords we truly need to invest in to achieve our specific goals. Now, let me 00:03:43.640 --> 00:03:43.650 align:start position:0% 00:03:43.650 --> 00:03:46.039 align:start position:0% tell <00:03:43.859><c>you </c><00:03:44.068><c>about </c><00:03:44.277><c>the </c><00:03:44.486><c>second </c><00:03:44.695><c>disadvantage.</c> 00:03:46.039 --> 00:03:46.049 align:start position:0% tell you about the second disadvantage. 00:03:46.049 --> 00:03:51.140 align:start position:0% tell you about the second disadvantage. This <00:03:46.475><c>competition </c><00:03:46.901><c>intensity </c><00:03:47.327><c>is </c><00:03:47.753><c>warm </c><00:03:48.179><c>from </c><00:03:48.605><c>her </c><00:03:49.031><c>perspective. </c><00:03:49.457><c>It </c><00:03:49.883><c>does</c> 00:03:51.140 --> 00:03:55.309 align:start position:0% This competition intensity is warm from her perspective. It does 00:03:55.309 --> 00:03:55.319 align:start position:0% 00:03:55.319 --> 00:03:56.509 align:start position:0% not <00:03:55.334><c>tell </c><00:03:55.349><c>you </c><00:03:55.364><c>whether </c><00:03:55.379><c>the </c><00:03:55.394><c>keyword </c><00:03:55.409><c>will </c><00:03:55.424><c>rise </c><00:03:55.439><c>or </c><00:03:55.454><c>fall </c><00:03:55.469><c>in </c><00:03:55.484><c>the </c><00:03:55.499><c>future.</c> 00:03:56.509 --> 00:04:00.469 align:start position:0% not tell you whether the keyword will rise or fall in the future. 00:04:00.469 --> 00:04:00.479 align:start position:0% 00:04:00.479 --> 00:04:05.330 align:start position:0% Even <00:04:00.637><c>if </c><00:04:00.795><c>it </c><00:04:00.953><c>is </c><00:04:01.111><c>a </c><00:04:01.269><c>keyword </c><00:04:01.427><c>you </c><00:04:01.585><c>shouldn't </c><00:04:01.743><c>enter </c><00:04:01.901><c>right </c><00:04:02.059><c>now </c><00:04:02.217><c>because </c><00:04:02.375><c>the </c><00:04:02.533><c>competition </c><00:04:02.691><c>intensity </c><00:04:02.849><c>is </c><00:04:03.007><c>high, </c><00:04:03.165><c>factors </c><00:04:03.323><c>like </c><00:04:03.481><c>the </c><00:04:03.639><c>number </c><00:04:03.797><c>of </c><00:04:03.955><c>product </c><00:04:04.113><c>registrations </c><00:04:04.271><c>or... </c><00:04:04.429><c>even </c><00:04:04.587><c>if </c><00:04:04.745><c>you </c><00:04:04.903><c>raise </c><00:04:05.061><c>it...</c> 00:04:05.330 --> 00:04:05.340 align:start position:0% Even if it is a keyword you shouldn't enter right now because the competition intensity is high, factors like the number of product registrations or... even if you raise it... 00:04:05.340 --> 00:04:07.610 align:start position:0% Even if it is a keyword you shouldn't enter right now because the competition intensity is high, factors like the number of product registrations or... even if you raise it... Lord <00:04:05.516><c>Jesus's </c><00:04:05.692><c>To </c><00:04:05.868><c>use </c><00:04:06.044><c>an </c><00:04:06.220><c>analogy, </c><00:04:06.396><c>you </c><00:04:06.572><c>cannot </c><00:04:06.748><c>tell </c><00:04:06.924><c>whether </c><00:04:07.100><c>the</c> 00:04:07.610 --> 00:04:07.620 align:start position:0% Lord Jesus's To use an analogy, you cannot tell whether the 00:04:07.620 --> 00:04:12.589 align:start position:0% Lord Jesus's To use an analogy, you cannot tell whether the competition <00:04:07.888><c>rate </c><00:04:08.156><c>will </c><00:04:08.424><c>decrease </c><00:04:08.692><c>in </c><00:04:08.960><c>the </c><00:04:09.228><c>future </c><00:04:09.496><c>or </c><00:04:09.764><c>if </c><00:04:10.032><c>the </c><00:04:10.300><c>number </c><00:04:10.568><c>of </c><00:04:10.836><c>entries </c><00:04:11.104><c>will </c><00:04:11.372><c>increase </c><00:04:11.640><c>significantly, </c><00:04:11.908><c>or </c><00:04:12.176><c>if</c> 00:04:12.589 --> 00:04:12.599 align:start position:0% competition rate will decrease in the future or if the number of entries will increase significantly, or if 00:04:12.599 --> 00:04:18.529 align:start position:0% competition rate will decrease in the future or if the number of entries will increase significantly, or if the <00:04:13.169><c>market </c><00:04:13.739><c>itself </c><00:04:14.309><c>is </c><00:04:14.879><c>growing </c><00:04:15.449><c>despite </c><00:04:16.019><c>the </c><00:04:16.589><c>fierce </c><00:04:17.159><c>competition </c><00:04:17.729><c>right </c><00:04:18.299><c>now.</c> 00:04:18.529 --> 00:04:18.539 align:start position:0% the market itself is growing despite the fierce competition right now. 00:04:18.539 --> 00:04:23.779 align:start position:0% the market itself is growing despite the fierce competition right now. Because <00:04:19.025><c>the </c><00:04:19.511><c>explanation </c><00:04:19.997><c>only </c><00:04:20.483><c>points </c><00:04:20.969><c>out </c><00:04:21.455><c>specific, </c><00:04:21.941><c>decisive </c><00:04:22.427><c>moments, </c><00:04:22.913><c>it </c><00:04:23.399><c>is</c> 00:04:23.779 --> 00:04:29.089 align:start position:0% Because the explanation only points out specific, decisive moments, it is 00:04:29.089 --> 00:04:29.099 align:start position:0% 00:04:29.099 --> 00:04:33.140 align:start position:0% data <00:04:29.227><c>that </c><00:04:29.355><c>makes </c><00:04:29.483><c>it </c><00:04:29.611><c>impossible </c><00:04:29.739><c>to </c><00:04:29.867><c>predict </c><00:04:29.995><c>the </c><00:04:30.123><c>timing—even </c><00:04:30.251><c>a </c><00:04:30.379><c>week </c><00:04:30.507><c>or </c><00:04:30.635><c>so </c><00:04:30.763><c>after </c><00:04:30.891><c>we </c><00:04:31.019><c>have </c><00:04:31.147><c>to </c><00:04:31.275><c>register </c><00:04:31.403><c>and </c><00:04:31.531><c>upload </c><00:04:31.659><c>our </c><00:04:31.787><c>products.</c> 00:04:33.140 --> 00:04:33.150 align:start position:0% data that makes it impossible to predict the timing—even a week or so after we have to register and upload our products. 00:04:33.150 --> 00:04:38.510 align:start position:0% data that makes it impossible to predict the timing—even a week or so after we have to register and upload our products. In <00:04:33.461><c>other </c><00:04:33.772><c>words, </c><00:04:34.083><c>because </c><00:04:34.394><c>the </c><00:04:34.705><c>data </c><00:04:35.016><c>is </c><00:04:35.327><c>unpredictable, </c><00:04:35.638><c>when </c><00:04:35.949><c>looking </c><00:04:36.260><c>at </c><00:04:36.571><c>the </c><00:04:36.882><c>intensity </c><00:04:37.193><c>of </c><00:04:37.504><c>competition, </c><00:04:37.815><c>it </c><00:04:38.126><c>is</c> 00:04:38.510 --> 00:04:42.080 align:start position:0% In other words, because the data is unpredictable, when looking at the intensity of competition, it is 00:04:42.080 --> 00:04:42.090 align:start position:0% 00:04:42.090 --> 00:04:46.010 align:start position:0% difficult <00:04:42.284><c>to </c><00:04:42.478><c>say </c><00:04:42.672><c>that </c><00:04:42.866><c>we </c><00:04:43.060><c>have </c><00:04:43.254><c>discovered </c><00:04:43.448><c>a </c><00:04:43.642><c>stable </c><00:04:43.836><c>keyword </c><00:04:44.030><c>or </c><00:04:44.224><c>honed </c><00:04:44.418><c>a </c><00:04:44.612><c>keyword </c><00:04:44.806><c>with </c><00:04:45.000><c>potential.</c> 00:04:46.010 --> 00:04:46.020 align:start position:0% difficult to say that we have discovered a stable keyword or honed a keyword with potential. 00:04:46.020 --> 00:04:50.570 align:start position:0% difficult to say that we have discovered a stable keyword or honed a keyword with potential. Of <00:04:46.260><c>course, </c><00:04:46.500><c>there </c><00:04:46.740><c>are </c><00:04:46.980><c>people </c><00:04:47.220><c>who </c><00:04:47.460><c>register </c><00:04:47.700><c>based </c><00:04:47.940><c>solely </c><00:04:48.180><c>on </c><00:04:48.420><c>that </c><00:04:48.660><c>and </c><00:04:48.900><c>make </c><00:04:49.140><c>money, </c><00:04:49.380><c>but </c><00:04:49.620><c>I</c> 00:04:50.570 --> 00:04:50.580 align:start position:0% Of course, there are people who register based solely on that and make money, but I 00:04:50.580 --> 00:04:53.060 align:start position:0% Of course, there are people who register based solely on that and make money, but I consider <00:04:50.921><c>them </c><00:04:51.262><c>a </c><00:04:51.603><c>very </c><00:04:51.944><c>small </c><00:04:52.285><c>minority.</c> 00:04:53.060 --> 00:04:53.070 align:start position:0% consider them a very small minority. 00:04:53.070 --> 00:04:57.050 align:start position:0% consider them a very small minority. Today, <00:04:53.480><c>I </c><00:04:53.890><c>want </c><00:04:54.300><c>to </c><00:04:54.710><c>tell </c><00:04:55.120><c>you </c><00:04:55.530><c>something. </c><00:04:55.940><c>I </c><00:04:56.350><c>share </c><00:04:56.760><c>various</c> 00:04:57.050 --> 00:04:57.060 align:start position:0% Today, I want to tell you something. I share various 00:04:57.060 --> 00:05:01.700 align:start position:0% Today, I want to tell you something. I share various keyword <00:04:57.960><c>analysis </c><00:04:58.860><c>methods </c><00:04:59.760><c>and </c><00:05:00.660><c>know-how </c><00:05:01.560><c>with</c> 00:05:01.700 --> 00:05:01.710 align:start position:0% keyword analysis methods and know-how with 00:05:01.710 --> 00:05:05.390 align:start position:0% keyword analysis methods and know-how with many <00:05:02.151><c>people </c><00:05:02.592><c>every </c><00:05:03.033><c>Thursday </c><00:05:03.474><c>night </c><00:05:03.915><c>at </c><00:05:04.356><c>10 </c><00:05:04.797><c>PM.</c> 00:05:05.390 --> 00:05:05.400 align:start position:0% many people every Thursday night at 10 PM. 00:05:05.400 --> 00:05:09.890 align:start position:0% many people every Thursday night at 10 PM. In <00:05:05.601><c>fact, </c><00:05:05.802><c>through </c><00:05:06.003><c>these </c><00:05:06.204><c>methods, </c><00:05:06.405><c>there </c><00:05:06.606><c>are </c><00:05:06.807><c>many </c><00:05:07.008><c>people </c><00:05:07.209><c>who </c><00:05:07.410><c>have </c><00:05:07.611><c>achieved </c><00:05:07.812><c>not </c><00:05:08.013><c>only </c><00:05:08.214><c>Power </c><00:05:08.415><c>but </c><00:05:08.616><c>also </c><00:05:08.817><c>B </c><00:05:09.018><c>Power, </c><00:05:09.219><c>and </c><00:05:09.420><c>many </c><00:05:09.621><c>people</c> 00:05:09.890 --> 00:05:09.900 align:start position:0% In fact, through these methods, there are many people who have achieved not only Power but also B Power, and many people 00:05:09.900 --> 00:05:11.360 align:start position:0% In fact, through these methods, there are many people who have achieved not only Power but also B Power, and many people 00:05:11.360 --> 00:05:11.370 align:start position:0% 00:05:11.370 --> 00:05:14.029 align:start position:0% send <00:05:11.503><c>me </c><00:05:11.636><c>PCs </c><00:05:11.769><c>during </c><00:05:11.902><c>my </c><00:05:12.035><c>broadcasts </c><00:05:12.168><c>to </c><00:05:12.301><c>verify </c><00:05:12.434><c>that </c><00:05:12.567><c>they </c><00:05:12.700><c>have </c><00:05:12.833><c>succeeded </c><00:05:12.966><c>and </c><00:05:13.099><c>their</c> 00:05:14.029 --> 00:05:14.039 align:start position:0% send me PCs during my broadcasts to verify that they have succeeded and their 00:05:14.039 --> 00:05:15.650 align:start position:0% send me PCs during my broadcasts to verify that they have succeeded and their sales <00:05:14.309><c>have </c><00:05:14.579><c>increased </c><00:05:14.849><c>significantly. </c><00:05:15.119><c>When</c> 00:05:15.650 --> 00:05:15.660 align:start position:0% sales have increased significantly. When 00:05:15.660 --> 00:05:20.420 align:start position:0% sales have increased significantly. When I <00:05:16.695><c>first </c><00:05:17.730><c>planned </c><00:05:18.765><c>this, </c><00:05:19.800><c>I</c> 00:05:20.420 --> 00:05:20.430 align:start position:0% I first planned this, I 00:05:20.430 --> 00:05:25.310 align:start position:0% I first planned this, I analyzed <00:05:20.619><c>it </c><00:05:20.808><c>logically </c><00:05:20.997><c>with </c><00:05:21.186><c>my </c><00:05:21.375><c>own </c><00:05:21.564><c>head </c><00:05:21.753><c>and </c><00:05:21.942><c>thought </c><00:05:22.131><c>it </c><00:05:22.320><c>was </c><00:05:22.509><c>an </c><00:05:22.698><c>opportunity, </c><00:05:22.887><c>but </c><00:05:23.076><c>I </c><00:05:23.265><c>was </c><00:05:23.454><c>not </c><00:05:23.643><c>certain </c><00:05:23.832><c>that </c><00:05:24.021><c>it </c><00:05:24.210><c>would </c><00:05:24.399><c>work </c><00:05:24.588><c>out </c><00:05:24.777><c>in </c><00:05:24.966><c>practice. </c><00:05:25.155><c>Okay,</c> 00:05:25.310 --> 00:05:25.320 align:start position:0% analyzed it logically with my own head and thought it was an opportunity, but I was not certain that it would work out in practice. Okay, 00:05:25.320 --> 00:05:30.710 align:start position:0% analyzed it logically with my own head and thought it was an opportunity, but I was not certain that it would work out in practice. Okay, but <00:05:30.210><c>I</c> 00:05:30.710 --> 00:05:30.720 align:start position:0% but I 00:05:30.720 --> 00:05:35.330 align:start position:0% but I believe <00:05:30.905><c>this </c><00:05:31.090><c>method </c><00:05:31.275><c>has </c><00:05:31.460><c>been </c><00:05:31.645><c>verified </c><00:05:31.830><c>through </c><00:05:32.015><c>the </c><00:05:32.200><c>countless </c><00:05:32.385><c>people </c><00:05:32.570><c>who </c><00:05:32.755><c>are </c><00:05:32.940><c>posting </c><00:05:33.125><c>using </c><00:05:33.310><c>'Baechu' </c><00:05:33.495><c>while </c><00:05:33.680><c>watching </c><00:05:33.865><c>his </c><00:05:34.050><c>broadcast.</c> 00:05:35.330 --> 00:05:35.340 align:start position:0% believe this method has been verified through the countless people who are posting using 'Baechu' while watching his broadcast. 00:05:35.340 --> 00:05:39.830 align:start position:0% believe this method has been verified through the countless people who are posting using 'Baechu' while watching his broadcast. Among <00:05:35.568><c>them, </c><00:05:35.796><c>there </c><00:05:36.024><c>are </c><00:05:36.252><c>two </c><00:05:36.480><c>things </c><00:05:36.708><c>I </c><00:05:36.936><c>want </c><00:05:37.164><c>to </c><00:05:37.392><c>share </c><00:05:37.620><c>with </c><00:05:37.848><c>you </c><00:05:38.076><c>today: </c><00:05:38.304><c>the </c><00:05:38.532><c>concept </c><00:05:38.760><c>of </c><00:05:38.988><c>"good </c><00:05:39.216><c>keywords" </c><00:05:39.444><c>and </c><00:05:39.672><c>the</c> 00:05:39.830 --> 00:05:39.840 align:start position:0% Among them, there are two things I want to share with you today: the concept of "good keywords" and the 00:05:39.840 --> 00:05:42.410 align:start position:0% Among them, there are two things I want to share with you today: the concept of "good keywords" and the concept <00:05:40.236><c>of </c><00:05:40.632><c>a </c><00:05:41.028><c>"keyword </c><00:05:41.424><c>planner." </c><00:05:41.820><c>I</c> 00:05:42.410 --> 00:05:42.420 align:start position:0% concept of a "keyword planner." I 00:05:42.420 --> 00:05:47.270 align:start position:0% concept of a "keyword planner." I originally <00:05:42.693><c>planned </c><00:05:42.966><c>to </c><00:05:43.239><c>explain </c><00:05:43.512><c>these </c><00:05:43.785><c>to </c><00:05:44.058><c>you </c><00:05:44.331><c>individually, </c><00:05:44.604><c>but </c><00:05:44.877><c>I </c><00:05:45.150><c>will </c><00:05:45.423><c>just </c><00:05:45.696><c>explain </c><00:05:45.969><c>them </c><00:05:46.242><c>all </c><00:05:46.515><c>at </c><00:05:46.788><c>once.</c> 00:05:47.270 --> 00:05:47.280 align:start position:0% originally planned to explain these to you individually, but I will just explain them all at once. 00:05:47.280 --> 00:05:48.230 align:start position:0% originally planned to explain these to you individually, but I will just explain them all at once. 00:05:48.230 --> 00:05:48.240 align:start position:0% 00:05:48.240 --> 00:05:52.460 align:start position:0% Since <00:05:48.464><c>I </c><00:05:48.688><c>am </c><00:05:48.912><c>not </c><00:05:49.136><c>a </c><00:05:49.360><c>perfect </c><00:05:49.584><c>marketer </c><00:05:49.808><c>myself, </c><00:05:50.032><c>I </c><00:05:50.256><c>am </c><00:05:50.480><c>constantly </c><00:05:50.704><c>working </c><00:05:50.928><c>on </c><00:05:51.152><c>the </c><00:05:51.376><c>methodology </c><00:05:51.600><c>I </c><00:05:51.824><c>created </c><00:05:52.048><c>and</c> 00:05:52.460 --> 00:05:52.470 align:start position:0% Since I am not a perfect marketer myself, I am constantly working on the methodology I created and 00:05:52.470 --> 00:05:55.040 align:start position:0% Since I am not a perfect marketer myself, I am constantly working on the methodology I created and deliberating <00:05:52.920><c>on </c><00:05:53.370><c>it </c><00:05:53.820><c>in </c><00:05:54.270><c>English.</c> 00:05:55.040 --> 00:05:55.050 align:start position:0% deliberating on it in English. 00:05:55.050 --> 00:05:58.880 align:start position:0% deliberating on it in English. Today, <00:05:55.370><c>I </c><00:05:55.690><c>will </c><00:05:56.010><c>tell </c><00:05:56.330><c>you </c><00:05:56.650><c>about </c><00:05:56.970><c>what </c><00:05:57.290><c>has </c><00:05:57.610><c>been </c><00:05:57.930><c>verified.</c> 00:05:58.880 --> 00:05:58.890 align:start position:0% Today, I will tell you about what has been verified. 00:05:58.890 --> 00:06:02.660 align:start position:0% Today, I will tell you about what has been verified. So, <00:05:59.124><c>let's </c><00:05:59.358><c>look </c><00:05:59.592><c>at </c><00:05:59.826><c>the </c><00:06:00.060><c>materials </c><00:06:00.294><c>and </c><00:06:00.528><c>I </c><00:06:00.762><c>will </c><00:06:00.996><c>explain. </c><00:06:01.230><c>The</c> 00:06:02.660 --> 00:06:02.670 align:start position:0% So, let's look at the materials and I will explain. The 00:06:02.670 --> 00:06:06.350 align:start position:0% So, let's look at the materials and I will explain. The reason <00:06:03.138><c>we </c><00:06:03.606><c>analyze </c><00:06:04.074><c>keywords </c><00:06:04.542><c>is </c><00:06:05.010><c>simple:</c> 00:06:06.350 --> 00:06:06.360 align:start position:0% reason we analyze keywords is simple: 00:06:06.360 --> 00:06:10.839 align:start position:0% reason we analyze keywords is simple: to <00:06:06.980><c>achieve </c><00:06:07.600><c>top </c><00:06:08.220><c>rankings.</c> 00:06:10.839 --> 00:06:10.849 align:start position:0% 00:06:10.849 --> 00:06:14.980 align:start position:0% That <00:06:11.369><c>is </c><00:06:11.889><c>why </c><00:06:12.409><c>many </c><00:06:12.929><c>people </c><00:06:13.449><c>attend </c><00:06:13.969><c>training,</c> 00:06:14.980 --> 00:06:14.990 align:start position:0% That is why many people attend training, 00:06:14.990 --> 00:06:19.149 align:start position:0% That is why many people attend training, use <00:06:15.178><c>various </c><00:06:15.366><c>programs, </c><00:06:15.554><c>sell </c><00:06:15.742><c>furniture, </c><00:06:15.930><c>and </c><00:06:16.118><c>do </c><00:06:16.306><c>all </c><00:06:16.494><c>sorts </c><00:06:16.682><c>of </c><00:06:16.870><c>other </c><00:06:17.058><c>things </c><00:06:17.246><c>to </c><00:06:17.434><c>achieve </c><00:06:17.622><c>top </c><00:06:17.810><c>rankings </c><00:06:17.998><c>on </c><00:06:18.186><c>Smart </c><00:06:18.374><c>To.</c> 00:06:19.149 --> 00:06:19.159 align:start position:0% use various programs, sell furniture, and do all sorts of other things to achieve top rankings on Smart To. 00:06:19.159 --> 00:06:23.680 align:start position:0% use various programs, sell furniture, and do all sorts of other things to achieve top rankings on Smart To. So, <00:06:19.345><c>instead </c><00:06:19.531><c>of </c><00:06:19.717><c>trying </c><00:06:19.903><c>to </c><00:06:20.089><c>follow </c><00:06:20.275><c>and </c><00:06:20.461><c>learn </c><00:06:20.647><c>all </c><00:06:20.833><c>those </c><00:06:21.019><c>logics, </c><00:06:21.205><c>I </c><00:06:21.391><c>believe </c><00:06:21.577><c>there </c><00:06:21.763><c>are </c><00:06:21.949><c>definitely </c><00:06:22.135><c>certain </c><00:06:22.321><c>rules </c><00:06:22.507><c>that</c> 00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:23.690 align:start position:0% So, instead of trying to follow and learn all those logics, I believe there are definitely certain rules that 00:06:23.690 --> 00:06:27.700 align:start position:0% So, instead of trying to follow and learn all those logics, I believe there are definitely certain rules that Naver <00:06:24.350><c>will </c><00:06:25.010><c>never </c><00:06:25.670><c>change. </c><00:06:26.330><c>I </c><00:06:26.990><c>thought </c><00:06:27.650><c>that</c> 00:06:27.700 --> 00:06:29.980 align:start position:0% Naver will never change. I thought that 00:06:29.980 --> 00:06:29.990 align:start position:0% 00:06:29.990 --> 00:06:33.820 align:start position:0% creating <00:06:30.207><c>my </c><00:06:30.424><c>own </c><00:06:30.641><c>theory </c><00:06:30.858><c>based </c><00:06:31.075><c>on </c><00:06:31.292><c>those </c><00:06:31.509><c>rules </c><00:06:31.726><c>is </c><00:06:31.943><c>the </c><00:06:32.160><c>best </c><00:06:32.377><c>way </c><00:06:32.594><c>to </c><00:06:32.811><c>achieve </c><00:06:33.028><c>stable </c><00:06:33.245><c>top </c><00:06:33.462><c>rankings. </c><00:06:33.679><c>There</c> 00:06:33.820 --> 00:06:35.740 align:start position:0% creating my own theory based on those rules is the best way to achieve stable top rankings. There 00:06:35.740 --> 00:06:35.750 align:start position:0% 00:06:35.750 --> 00:06:39.879 align:start position:0% are <00:06:35.921><c>two </c><00:06:36.092><c>things </c><00:06:36.263><c>on </c><00:06:36.434><c>Naver </c><00:06:36.605><c>that </c><00:06:36.776><c>never </c><00:06:36.947><c>change </c><00:06:37.118><c>that </c><00:06:37.289><c>give </c><00:06:37.460><c>you </c><00:06:37.631><c>an </c><00:06:37.802><c>advantage </c><00:06:37.973><c>in </c><00:06:38.144><c>top </c><00:06:38.315><c>rankings. </c><00:06:38.486><c>This </c><00:06:38.657><c>is </c><00:06:38.828><c>because </c><00:06:38.999><c>it </c><00:06:39.170><c>seems </c><00:06:39.341><c>to </c><00:06:39.512><c>be</c> 00:06:39.879 --> 00:06:39.889 align:start position:0% are two things on Naver that never change that give you an advantage in top rankings. This is because it seems to be 00:06:39.889 --> 00:06:42.790 align:start position:0% are two things on Naver that never change that give you an advantage in top rankings. This is because it seems to be related <00:06:40.194><c>to </c><00:06:40.499><c>the </c><00:06:40.804><c>latest </c><00:06:41.109><c>registered </c><00:06:41.414><c>products, </c><00:06:41.719><c>right?</c> 00:06:42.790 --> 00:06:42.800 align:start position:0% related to the latest registered products, right? 00:06:42.800 --> 00:06:47.080 align:start position:0% related to the latest registered products, right? And <00:06:43.011><c>the </c><00:06:43.222><c>second </c><00:06:43.433><c>is </c><00:06:43.644><c>products </c><00:06:43.855><c>with </c><00:06:44.066><c>high </c><00:06:44.277><c>sales </c><00:06:44.488><c>volume. </c><00:06:44.699><c>I </c><00:06:44.910><c>believe </c><00:06:45.121><c>that </c><00:06:45.332><c>"products </c><00:06:45.543><c>go </c><00:06:45.754><c>to </c><00:06:45.965><c>top </c><00:06:46.176><c>search </c><00:06:46.387><c>rankings"—these</c> 00:06:47.080 --> 00:06:47.090 align:start position:0% And the second is products with high sales volume. I believe that "products go to top search rankings"—these 00:06:47.090 --> 00:06:54.520 align:start position:0% And the second is products with high sales volume. I believe that "products go to top search rankings"—these two <00:06:47.502><c>factors </c><00:06:47.914><c>are </c><00:06:48.326><c>absolute, </c><00:06:48.738><c>immutable </c><00:06:49.150><c>principles </c><00:06:49.562><c>that </c><00:06:49.974><c>Smart </c><00:06:50.386><c>Store </c><00:06:50.798><c>will </c><00:06:51.210><c>likely </c><00:06:51.622><c>never </c><00:06:52.034><c>change </c><00:06:52.446><c>in </c><00:06:52.858><c>the </c><00:06:53.270><c>future. </c><00:06:53.682><c>It </c><00:06:54.094><c>is</c> 00:06:54.520 --> 00:06:56.920 align:start position:0% two factors are absolute, immutable principles that Smart Store will likely never change in the future. It is 00:06:56.920 --> 00:06:56.930 align:start position:0% 00:06:56.930 --> 00:07:01.749 align:start position:0% simple: <00:06:57.239><c>if </c><00:06:57.548><c>you </c><00:06:57.857><c>register </c><00:06:58.166><c>recently </c><00:06:58.475><c>and </c><00:06:58.784><c>sell </c><00:06:59.093><c>a </c><00:06:59.402><c>lot, </c><00:06:59.711><c>you </c><00:07:00.020><c>will </c><00:07:00.329><c>achieve </c><00:07:00.638><c>top </c><00:07:00.947><c>rankings.</c> 00:07:01.749 --> 00:07:01.759 align:start position:0% simple: if you register recently and sell a lot, you will achieve top rankings. 00:07:01.759 --> 00:07:07.330 align:start position:0% simple: if you register recently and sell a lot, you will achieve top rankings. However, <00:07:01.882><c>I </c><00:07:02.005><c>wondered </c><00:07:02.128><c>why </c><00:07:02.251><c>we </c><00:07:02.374><c>are </c><00:07:02.497><c>unable </c><00:07:02.620><c>to </c><00:07:02.743><c>do </c><00:07:02.866><c>this. </c><00:07:02.989><c>I </c><00:07:03.112><c>started </c><00:07:03.235><c>thinking </c><00:07:03.358><c>from </c><00:07:03.481><c>that </c><00:07:03.604><c>point. </c><00:07:03.727><c>You </c><00:07:03.850><c>all</c> 00:07:07.330 --> 00:07:11.350 align:start position:0% 00:07:11.350 --> 00:07:11.360 align:start position:0% 00:07:11.360 --> 00:07:13.960 align:start position:0% know <00:07:11.520><c>that </c><00:07:11.680><c>keyboard </c><00:07:11.840><c>search </c><00:07:12.000><c>volume </c><00:07:12.160><c>is </c><00:07:12.320><c>driven </c><00:07:12.480><c>by </c><00:07:12.640><c>"Suyuk" </c><00:07:12.800><c>(sweet </c><00:07:12.960><c>pork). </c><00:07:13.120><c>I</c> 00:07:13.960 --> 00:07:19.900 align:start position:0% know that keyboard search volume is driven by "Suyuk" (sweet pork). I 00:07:19.900 --> 00:07:25.159 align:start position:0% 00:07:25.159 --> 00:07:25.169 align:start position:0% 00:07:25.169 --> 00:07:33.709 align:start position:0% considered <00:07:25.470><c>how </c><00:07:25.771><c>analyzing </c><00:07:26.072><c>this </c><00:07:26.373><c>demand </c><00:07:26.674><c>pattern </c><00:07:26.975><c>would </c><00:07:27.276><c>allow </c><00:07:27.577><c>us </c><00:07:27.878><c>to </c><00:07:28.179><c>maximize </c><00:07:28.480><c>our </c><00:07:28.781><c>recency </c><00:07:29.082><c>score </c><00:07:29.383><c>and </c><00:07:29.684><c>easily </c><00:07:29.985><c>secure </c><00:07:30.286><c>sales </c><00:07:30.587><c>volume </c><00:07:30.888><c>bonuses </c><00:07:31.189><c>without </c><00:07:31.490><c>any </c><00:07:31.791><c>financial </c><00:07:32.092><c>burden. </c><00:07:32.393><c>If </c><00:07:32.694><c>you</c> 00:07:33.709 --> 00:07:33.719 align:start position:0% considered how analyzing this demand pattern would allow us to maximize our recency score and easily secure sales volume bonuses without any financial burden. If you 00:07:33.719 --> 00:07:39.290 align:start position:0% considered how analyzing this demand pattern would allow us to maximize our recency score and easily secure sales volume bonuses without any financial burden. If you look <00:07:33.938><c>at </c><00:07:34.157><c>the </c><00:07:34.376><c>points </c><00:07:34.595><c>where </c><00:07:34.814><c>most </c><00:07:35.033><c>people </c><00:07:35.252><c>register </c><00:07:35.471><c>products, </c><00:07:35.690><c>I </c><00:07:35.909><c>noticed </c><00:07:36.128><c>that </c><00:07:36.347><c>they </c><00:07:36.566><c>do </c><00:07:36.785><c>so </c><00:07:37.004><c>around </c><00:07:37.223><c>the </c><00:07:37.442><c>time </c><00:07:37.661><c>a </c><00:07:37.880><c>"</c> 00:07:39.290 --> 00:07:39.300 align:start position:0% look at the points where most people register products, I noticed that they do so around the time a " 00:07:39.300 --> 00:07:43.850 align:start position:0% look at the points where most people register products, I noticed that they do so around the time a " Season <00:07:39.619><c>2" </c><00:07:39.938><c>begins </c><00:07:40.257><c>or </c><00:07:40.576><c>when </c><00:07:40.895><c>people </c><00:07:41.214><c>start </c><00:07:41.533><c>looking </c><00:07:41.852><c>for </c><00:07:42.171><c>items </c><00:07:42.490><c>they </c><00:07:42.809><c>wear. </c><00:07:43.128><c>However, </c><00:07:43.447><c>when </c><00:07:43.766><c>I</c> 00:07:43.850 --> 00:07:47.600 align:start position:0% Season 2" begins or when people start looking for items they wear. However, when I 00:07:47.600 --> 00:07:52.370 align:start position:0% 00:07:52.370 --> 00:07:52.380 align:start position:0% 00:07:52.380 --> 00:07:56.600 align:start position:0% analyzed <00:07:52.578><c>the </c><00:07:52.776><c>pattern </c><00:07:52.974><c>where </c><00:07:53.172><c>active </c><00:07:53.370><c>search </c><00:07:53.568><c>for </c><00:07:53.766><c>a </c><00:07:53.964><c>product </c><00:07:54.162><c>or </c><00:07:54.360><c>keyword </c><00:07:54.558><c>stops </c><00:07:54.756><c>once </c><00:07:54.954><c>keyboard </c><00:07:55.152><c>IP </c><00:07:55.350><c>site </c><00:07:55.548><c>lookups </c><00:07:55.746><c>start, </c><00:07:55.944><c>I </c><00:07:56.142><c>discovered </c><00:07:56.340><c>a </c><00:07:56.538><c>"</c> 00:07:56.600 --> 00:07:56.610 align:start position:0% analyzed the pattern where active search for a product or keyword stops once keyboard IP site lookups start, I discovered a " 00:07:56.610 --> 00:08:01.550 align:start position:0% analyzed the pattern where active search for a product or keyword stops once keyboard IP site lookups start, I discovered a " life <00:07:57.312><c>curve" </c><00:07:58.014><c>for </c><00:07:58.716><c>these </c><00:07:59.418><c>keywords. </c><00:08:00.120><c>I</c> 00:08:01.550 --> 00:08:06.890 align:start position:0% life curve" for these keywords. I 00:08:06.890 --> 00:08:06.900 align:start position:0% 00:08:06.900 --> 00:08:11.630 align:start position:0% thought <00:08:07.094><c>that </c><00:08:07.288><c>by </c><00:08:07.482><c>identifying </c><00:08:07.676><c>and </c><00:08:07.870><c>utilizing </c><00:08:08.064><c>this </c><00:08:08.258><c>curve, </c><00:08:08.452><c>we </c><00:08:08.646><c>might </c><00:08:08.840><c>discover </c><00:08:09.034><c>principles </c><00:08:09.228><c>for </c><00:08:09.422><c>maximizing </c><00:08:09.616><c>recency </c><00:08:09.810><c>and </c><00:08:10.004><c>easily </c><00:08:10.198><c>registering </c><00:08:10.392><c>sales </c><00:08:10.586><c>volume. </c><00:08:10.780><c>So, </c><00:08:10.974><c>I</c> 00:08:11.630 --> 00:08:11.640 align:start position:0% thought that by identifying and utilizing this curve, we might discover principles for maximizing recency and easily registering sales volume. So, I 00:08:11.640 --> 00:08:14.420 align:start position:0% thought that by identifying and utilizing this curve, we might discover principles for maximizing recency and easily registering sales volume. So, I divided <00:08:11.817><c>this </c><00:08:11.994><c>keyword </c><00:08:12.171><c>life </c><00:08:12.348><c>cycle </c><00:08:12.525><c>into </c><00:08:12.702><c>two </c><00:08:12.879><c>parts. </c><00:08:13.056><c>If </c><00:08:13.233><c>we </c><00:08:13.410><c>look </c><00:08:13.587><c>at</c> 00:08:14.420 --> 00:08:14.430 align:start position:0% divided this keyword life cycle into two parts. If we look at 00:08:14.430 --> 00:08:16.540 align:start position:0% divided this keyword life cycle into two parts. If we look at how <00:08:14.508><c>it </c><00:08:14.586><c>turns </c><00:08:14.664><c>out, </c><00:08:14.742><c>the </c><00:08:14.820><c>"</c> 00:08:16.540 --> 00:08:16.550 align:start position:0% how it turns out, the " 00:08:16.550 --> 00:08:20.200 align:start position:0% how it turns out, the " Suyuk" <00:08:16.820><c>keyword... </c><00:08:17.090><c>It </c><00:08:17.360><c>came </c><00:08:17.630><c>out </c><00:08:17.900><c>as </c><00:08:18.170><c>a </c><00:08:18.440><c>whole. </c><00:08:18.710><c>I </c><00:08:18.980><c>am</c> 00:08:20.200 --> 00:08:23.929 align:start position:0% Suyuk" keyword... It came out as a whole. I am 00:08:23.929 --> 00:08:27.780 align:start position:0% 00:08:27.780 --> 00:08:27.790 align:start position:0% 00:08:27.790 --> 00:08:31.030 align:start position:0% 00:08:31.030 --> 00:08:35.639 align:start position:0% 00:08:35.639 --> 00:08:35.649 align:start position:0% 00:08:35.649 --> 00:08:40.990 align:start position:0% providing <00:08:35.807><c>keywords </c><00:08:35.965><c>that </c><00:08:36.123><c>show </c><00:08:36.281><c>patterns </c><00:08:36.439><c>where </c><00:08:36.597><c>the </c><00:08:36.755><c>keyboard </c><00:08:36.913><c>church </c><00:08:37.071><c>rises </c><00:08:37.229><c>or </c><00:08:37.387><c>falls </c><00:08:37.545><c>due </c><00:08:37.703><c>to </c><00:08:37.861><c>issues </c><00:08:38.019><c>such </c><00:08:38.177><c>as </c><00:08:38.335><c>short-term </c><00:08:38.493><c>tangles, </c><00:08:38.651><c>trending </c><00:08:38.809><c>topics, </c><00:08:38.967><c>seasonal </c><00:08:39.125><c>topics, </c><00:08:39.283><c>and </c><00:08:39.441><c>event-related </c><00:08:39.599><c>matters. </c><00:08:39.757><c>I </c><00:08:39.915><c>will</c> 00:08:40.990 --> 00:08:41.000 align:start position:0% providing keywords that show patterns where the keyboard church rises or falls due to issues such as short-term tangles, trending topics, seasonal topics, and event-related matters. I will 00:08:41.000 --> 00:08:44.350 align:start position:0% providing keywords that show patterns where the keyboard church rises or falls due to issues such as short-term tangles, trending topics, seasonal topics, and event-related matters. I will explain <00:08:41.289><c>long-term </c><00:08:41.578><c>keywords </c><00:08:41.867><c>later. </c><00:08:42.156><c>After </c><00:08:42.445><c>researching, </c><00:08:42.734><c>I </c><00:08:43.023><c>found </c><00:08:43.312><c>that </c><00:08:43.601><c>while </c><00:08:43.890><c>it </c><00:08:44.179><c>is</c> 00:08:44.350 --> 00:08:44.360 align:start position:0% explain long-term keywords later. After researching, I found that while it is 00:08:44.360 --> 00:08:49.930 align:start position:0% explain long-term keywords later. After researching, I found that while it is difficult <00:08:44.955><c>to </c><00:08:45.550><c>target </c><00:08:46.145><c>"Dragon" </c><00:08:46.740><c>and </c><00:08:47.335><c>"Empty" </c><00:08:47.930><c>keywords,</c> 00:08:49.930 --> 00:08:49.940 align:start position:0% difficult to target "Dragon" and "Empty" keywords, 00:08:49.940 --> 00:08:54.850 align:start position:0% difficult to target "Dragon" and "Empty" keywords, anyone <00:08:50.468><c>can </c><00:08:50.996><c>easily </c><00:08:51.524><c>target </c><00:08:52.052><c>"Communication" </c><00:08:52.580><c>keywords. </c><00:08:53.108><c>For </c><00:08:53.636><c>example, </c><00:08:54.164><c>let's</c> 00:08:54.850 --> 00:08:54.860 align:start position:0% anyone can easily target "Communication" keywords. For example, let's 00:08:54.860 --> 00:09:00.560 align:start position:0% anyone can easily target "Communication" keywords. For example, let's look <00:08:55.052><c>at </c><00:08:55.244><c>"Season </c><00:08:55.436><c>2 </c><00:08:55.628><c>Halloween." </c><00:08:55.820><c>If </c><00:08:56.012><c>it </c><00:08:56.204><c>is</c> 00:09:00.560 --> 00:09:00.570 align:start position:0% 00:09:00.570 --> 00:09:05.690 align:start position:0% Halloween, <00:09:00.834><c>if </c><00:09:01.098><c>we </c><00:09:01.362><c>accurately </c><00:09:01.626><c>identify </c><00:09:01.890><c>the </c><00:09:02.154><c>timing </c><00:09:02.418><c>when </c><00:09:02.682><c>search </c><00:09:02.946><c>volume </c><00:09:03.210><c>appears </c><00:09:03.474><c>for </c><00:09:03.738><c>Hallyu </c><00:09:04.002><c>costumes </c><00:09:04.266><c>and </c><00:09:04.530><c>Halloween </c><00:09:04.794><c>event </c><00:09:05.058><c>props,</c> 00:09:05.690 --> 00:09:05.700 align:start position:0% Halloween, if we accurately identify the timing when search volume appears for Hallyu costumes and Halloween event props, 00:09:05.700 --> 00:09:11.120 align:start position:0% Halloween, if we accurately identify the timing when search volume appears for Hallyu costumes and Halloween event props, we <00:09:06.332><c>can </c><00:09:06.964><c>register </c><00:09:07.596><c>here </c><00:09:08.228><c>when </c><00:09:08.860><c>others </c><00:09:09.492><c>are </c><00:09:10.124><c>registering.</c> 00:09:11.120 --> 00:09:15.100 align:start position:0% we can register here when others are registering. 00:09:15.100 --> 00:09:15.110 align:start position:0% 00:09:15.110 --> 00:09:19.480 align:start position:0% What <00:09:15.407><c>is </c><00:09:15.704><c>good </c><00:09:16.001><c>about </c><00:09:16.298><c>that? </c><00:09:16.595><c>If </c><00:09:16.892><c>you </c><00:09:17.189><c>register </c><00:09:17.486><c>here, </c><00:09:17.783><c>competitors </c><00:09:18.080><c>have </c><00:09:18.377><c>almost </c><00:09:18.674><c>no </c><00:09:18.971><c>sales </c><00:09:19.268><c>volume,</c> 00:09:19.480 --> 00:09:19.490 align:start position:0% What is good about that? If you register here, competitors have almost no sales volume, 00:09:19.490 --> 00:09:21.199 align:start position:0% What is good about that? If you register here, competitors have almost no sales volume, so it is 00:09:21.199 --> 00:09:21.209 align:start position:0% so it is 00:09:21.209 --> 00:09:27.600 align:start position:0% so it is good <00:09:21.541><c>for </c><00:09:21.873><c>building </c><00:09:22.205><c>sales </c><00:09:22.537><c>and </c><00:09:22.869><c>scores. </c><00:09:23.201><c>In </c><00:09:23.533><c>other </c><00:09:23.865><c>words, </c><00:09:24.197><c>it </c><00:09:24.529><c>is </c><00:09:24.861><c>a</c> 00:09:27.600 --> 00:09:27.610 align:start position:0% 00:09:27.610 --> 00:09:32.400 align:start position:0% point <00:09:27.756><c>where </c><00:09:27.902><c>you </c><00:09:28.048><c>can </c><00:09:28.194><c>easily </c><00:09:28.340><c>obtain </c><00:09:28.486><c>the </c><00:09:28.632><c>latest </c><00:09:28.778><c>trends </c><00:09:28.924><c>and </c><00:09:29.070><c>sales </c><00:09:29.216><c>volume </c><00:09:29.362><c>scores. </c><00:09:29.508><c>If </c><00:09:29.654><c>you </c><00:09:29.800><c>register </c><00:09:29.946><c>without </c><00:09:30.092><c>proper </c><00:09:30.238><c>planning, </c><00:09:30.384><c>you </c><00:09:30.530><c>will </c><00:09:30.676><c>end </c><00:09:30.822><c>up</c> 00:09:32.400 --> 00:09:32.410 align:start position:0% point where you can easily obtain the latest trends and sales volume scores. If you register without proper planning, you will end up 00:09:32.410 --> 00:09:36.960 align:start position:0% point where you can easily obtain the latest trends and sales volume scores. If you register without proper planning, you will end up lacking <00:09:33.310><c>the </c><00:09:34.210><c>latest </c><00:09:35.110><c>score </c><00:09:36.010><c>later.</c> 00:09:36.960 --> 00:09:36.970 align:start position:0% lacking the latest score later. 00:09:36.970 --> 00:09:38.990 align:start position:0% lacking the latest score later. 00:09:38.990 --> 00:09:39.000 align:start position:0% 00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:43.579 align:start position:0% The <00:09:39.321><c>key </c><00:09:39.642><c>is </c><00:09:39.963><c>to </c><00:09:40.284><c>find </c><00:09:40.605><c>the </c><00:09:40.926><c>appropriate </c><00:09:41.247><c>point </c><00:09:41.568><c>and </c><00:09:41.889><c>register </c><00:09:42.210><c>the </c><00:09:42.531><c>product.</c> 00:09:43.579 --> 00:09:43.589 align:start position:0% The key is to find the appropriate point and register the product. 00:09:43.589 --> 00:09:49.430 align:start position:0% The key is to find the appropriate point and register the product. So, <00:09:44.296><c>to </c><00:09:45.003><c>explain </c><00:09:45.710><c>this </c><00:09:46.417><c>keyword </c><00:09:47.124><c>analysis </c><00:09:47.831><c>more </c><00:09:48.538><c>simply,</c> 00:09:49.430 --> 00:09:49.440 align:start position:0% So, to explain this keyword analysis more simply, 00:09:49.440 --> 00:09:51.740 align:start position:0% So, to explain this keyword analysis more simply, there <00:09:49.496><c>is </c><00:09:49.552><c>a </c><00:09:49.608><c>first </c><00:09:49.664><c>stage </c><00:09:49.720><c>called </c><00:09:49.776><c>the </c><00:09:49.832><c>"Introduction </c><00:09:49.888><c>Phase."</c> 00:09:51.740 --> 00:09:51.750 align:start position:0% there is a first stage called the "Introduction Phase." 00:09:51.750 --> 00:09:56.450 align:start position:0% there is a first stage called the "Introduction Phase." During <00:09:52.104><c>this </c><00:09:52.458><c>time, </c><00:09:52.812><c>searches </c><00:09:53.166><c>for </c><00:09:53.520><c>specific </c><00:09:53.874><c>keywords </c><00:09:54.228><c>begin. </c><00:09:54.582><c>When </c><00:09:54.936><c>searched, </c><00:09:55.290><c>people</c> 00:09:56.450 --> 00:09:56.460 align:start position:0% During this time, searches for specific keywords begin. When searched, people 00:09:56.460 --> 00:10:00.560 align:start position:0% During this time, searches for specific keywords begin. When searched, people explain <00:09:56.787><c>"Halloween" </c><00:09:57.114><c>and </c><00:09:57.441><c>"Open." </c><00:09:57.768><c>Let's </c><00:09:58.095><c>take </c><00:09:58.422><c>a </c><00:09:58.749><c>look. </c><00:09:59.076><c>People </c><00:09:59.403><c>eagerly </c><00:09:59.730><c>awaiting </c><00:10:00.057><c>Halloween</c> 00:10:00.560 --> 00:10:04.310 align:start position:0% explain "Halloween" and "Open." Let's take a look. People eagerly awaiting Halloween 00:10:04.310 --> 00:10:04.320 align:start position:0% 00:10:04.320 --> 00:10:08.570 align:start position:0% will <00:10:04.501><c>likely </c><00:10:04.682><c>search </c><00:10:04.863><c>for </c><00:10:05.044><c>new </c><00:10:05.225><c>Halloween </c><00:10:05.406><c>items, </c><00:10:05.587><c>products, </c><00:10:05.768><c>or </c><00:10:05.949><c>event </c><00:10:06.130><c>props. </c><00:10:06.311><c>These </c><00:10:06.492><c>early </c><00:10:06.673><c>adopters, </c><00:10:06.854><c>who </c><00:10:07.035><c>have </c><00:10:07.216><c>been </c><00:10:07.397><c>waiting </c><00:10:07.578><c>for </c><00:10:07.759><c>this, </c><00:10:07.940><c>will </c><00:10:08.121><c>see </c><00:10:08.302><c>their</c> 00:10:08.570 --> 00:10:08.580 align:start position:0% will likely search for new Halloween items, products, or event props. These early adopters, who have been waiting for this, will see their 00:10:08.580 --> 00:10:12.470 align:start position:0% will likely search for new Halloween items, products, or event props. These early adopters, who have been waiting for this, will see their search <00:10:09.011><c>volume </c><00:10:09.442><c>start </c><00:10:09.873><c>to </c><00:10:10.304><c>rise </c><00:10:10.735><c>relatively </c><00:10:11.166><c>early. </c><00:10:11.597><c>If </c><00:10:12.028><c>you</c> 00:10:12.470 --> 00:10:12.480 align:start position:0% search volume start to rise relatively early. If you 00:10:12.480 --> 00:10:17.720 align:start position:0% search volume start to rise relatively early. If you can <00:10:12.761><c>gauge </c><00:10:13.042><c>when </c><00:10:13.323><c>this </c><00:10:13.604><c>search </c><00:10:13.885><c>volume </c><00:10:14.166><c>surges, </c><00:10:14.447><c>you </c><00:10:14.728><c>can </c><00:10:15.009><c>get </c><00:10:15.290><c>a </c><00:10:15.571><c>sense </c><00:10:15.852><c>of </c><00:10:16.133><c>when </c><00:10:16.414><c>to </c><00:10:16.695><c>register </c><00:10:16.976><c>your </c><00:10:17.257><c>product </c><00:10:17.538><c>to</c> 00:10:17.720 --> 00:10:17.730 align:start position:0% can gauge when this search volume surges, you can get a sense of when to register your product to 00:10:17.730 --> 00:10:21.740 align:start position:0% can gauge when this search volume surges, you can get a sense of when to register your product to maximize <00:10:18.210><c>your </c><00:10:18.690><c>sales </c><00:10:19.170><c>and </c><00:10:19.650><c>revenue </c><00:10:20.130><c>scores. </c><00:10:20.610><c>This </c><00:10:21.090><c>is </c><00:10:21.570><c>the</c> 00:10:21.740 --> 00:10:23.090 align:start position:0% maximize your sales and revenue scores. This is the 00:10:23.090 --> 00:10:23.100 align:start position:0% 00:10:23.100 --> 00:10:27.680 align:start position:0% growth <00:10:23.357><c>phase; </c><00:10:23.614><c>if </c><00:10:23.871><c>you </c><00:10:24.128><c>enter </c><00:10:24.385><c>at </c><00:10:24.642><c>this </c><00:10:24.899><c>stage, </c><00:10:25.156><c>you </c><00:10:25.413><c>will </c><00:10:25.670><c>climb </c><00:10:25.927><c>higher, </c><00:10:26.184><c>and</c> 00:10:27.680 --> 00:10:27.690 align:start position:0% growth phase; if you enter at this stage, you will climb higher, and 00:10:27.690 --> 00:10:32.619 align:start position:0% growth phase; if you enter at this stage, you will climb higher, and competition <00:10:28.560><c>will </c><00:10:29.430><c>intensify. </c><00:10:30.300><c>The</c> 00:10:32.619 --> 00:10:32.629 align:start position:0% competition will intensify. The 00:10:32.629 --> 00:10:36.910 align:start position:0% competition will intensify. The competition <00:10:32.869><c>rate </c><00:10:33.109><c>will </c><00:10:33.349><c>rise. </c><00:10:33.589><c>Then, </c><00:10:33.829><c>what </c><00:10:34.069><c>needs </c><00:10:34.309><c>to </c><00:10:34.549><c>be </c><00:10:34.789><c>done? </c><00:10:35.029><c>Advertising</c> 00:10:36.910 --> 00:10:36.920 align:start position:0% competition rate will rise. Then, what needs to be done? Advertising 00:10:36.920 --> 00:10:41.290 align:start position:0% competition rate will rise. Then, what needs to be done? Advertising or <00:10:37.229><c>purchasing </c><00:10:37.538><c>is </c><00:10:37.847><c>necessary </c><00:10:38.156><c>so </c><00:10:38.465><c>that </c><00:10:38.774><c>we </c><00:10:39.083><c>can </c><00:10:39.392><c>survive </c><00:10:39.701><c>and</c> 00:10:41.290 --> 00:10:41.300 align:start position:0% or purchasing is necessary so that we can survive and 00:10:41.300 --> 00:10:46.500 align:start position:0% or purchasing is necessary so that we can survive and maximize 00:10:46.500 --> 00:10:46.510 align:start position:0% maximize 00:10:46.510 --> 00:10:52.860 align:start position:0% maximize sales <00:10:46.838><c>during </c><00:10:47.166><c>this </c><00:10:47.494><c>peak </c><00:10:47.822><c>moment. </c><00:10:48.150><c>The </c><00:10:48.478><c>key </c><00:10:48.806><c>point </c><00:10:49.134><c>here </c><00:10:49.462><c>is </c><00:10:49.790><c>the </c><00:10:50.118><c>current </c><00:10:50.446><c>trend. </c><00:10:50.774><c>At </c><00:10:51.102><c>this </c><00:10:51.430><c>stage, </c><00:10:51.758><c>you </c><00:10:52.086><c>need </c><00:10:52.414><c>to</c> 00:10:52.860 --> 00:10:55.050 align:start position:0% sales during this peak moment. The key point here is the current trend. At this stage, you need to 00:10:55.050 --> 00:10:55.060 align:start position:0% 00:10:55.060 --> 00:10:59.700 align:start position:0% quickly <00:10:55.288><c>clear </c><00:10:55.516><c>inventory. </c><00:10:55.744><c>Because </c><00:10:55.972><c>this </c><00:10:56.200><c>is </c><00:10:56.428><c>a </c><00:10:56.656><c>seasonal, </c><00:10:56.884><c>trending, </c><00:10:57.112><c>and </c><00:10:57.340><c>buzz-driven </c><00:10:57.568><c>trend, </c><00:10:57.796><c>if </c><00:10:58.024><c>you </c><00:10:58.252><c>wait </c><00:10:58.480><c>until </c><00:10:58.708><c>then, </c><00:10:58.936><c>you </c><00:10:59.164><c>have </c><00:10:59.392><c>to</c> 00:10:59.700 --> 00:11:01.860 align:start position:0% quickly clear inventory. Because this is a seasonal, trending, and buzz-driven trend, if you wait until then, you have to 00:11:01.860 --> 00:11:01.870 align:start position:0% 00:11:01.870 --> 00:11:05.940 align:start position:0% wait <00:11:02.130><c>a </c><00:11:02.390><c>year. </c><00:11:02.650><c>Your</c> 00:11:05.940 --> 00:11:05.950 align:start position:0% 00:11:05.950 --> 00:11:10.260 align:start position:0% money <00:11:06.197><c>gets </c><00:11:06.444><c>tied </c><00:11:06.691><c>up </c><00:11:06.938><c>for </c><00:11:07.185><c>a </c><00:11:07.432><c>whole </c><00:11:07.679><c>year. </c><00:11:07.926><c>Therefore, </c><00:11:08.173><c>we </c><00:11:08.420><c>need </c><00:11:08.667><c>to </c><00:11:08.914><c>register </c><00:11:09.161><c>products </c><00:11:09.408><c>at </c><00:11:09.655><c>this </c><00:11:09.902><c>time,</c> 00:11:10.260 --> 00:11:10.270 align:start position:0% money gets tied up for a whole year. Therefore, we need to register products at this time, 00:11:10.270 --> 00:11:15.120 align:start position:0% money gets tied up for a whole year. Therefore, we need to register products at this time, make <00:11:11.005><c>money, </c><00:11:11.740><c>and </c><00:11:12.475><c>then </c><00:11:13.210><c>start</c> 00:11:15.120 --> 00:11:15.130 align:start position:0% make money, and then start 00:11:15.130 --> 00:11:19.140 align:start position:0% make money, and then start preparing <00:11:15.410><c>to </c><00:11:15.690><c>slowly </c><00:11:15.970><c>clear </c><00:11:16.250><c>out </c><00:11:16.530><c>our </c><00:11:16.810><c>inventory. </c><00:11:17.090><c>That </c><00:11:17.370><c>is </c><00:11:17.650><c>the </c><00:11:17.930><c>structure </c><00:11:18.210><c>I </c><00:11:18.490><c>see.</c> 00:11:19.140 --> 00:11:19.150 align:start position:0% preparing to slowly clear out our inventory. That is the structure I see. 00:11:19.150 --> 00:11:22.710 align:start position:0% preparing to slowly clear out our inventory. That is the structure I see. Now <00:11:19.540><c>we </c><00:11:19.930><c>understand </c><00:11:20.320><c>what </c><00:11:20.710><c>a </c><00:11:21.100><c>short </c><00:11:21.490><c>cube </c><00:11:21.880><c>is.</c> 00:11:22.710 --> 00:11:22.720 align:start position:0% Now we understand what a short cube is. 00:11:22.720 --> 00:11:26.040 align:start position:0% Now we understand what a short cube is. So, <00:11:22.969><c>this... </c><00:11:23.218><c>You </c><00:11:23.467><c>need </c><00:11:23.716><c>to </c><00:11:23.965><c>find </c><00:11:24.214><c>"2-second </c><00:11:24.463><c>turn" </c><00:11:24.712><c>keywords. </c><00:11:24.961><c>You </c><00:11:25.210><c>can </c><00:11:25.459><c>do </c><00:11:25.708><c>this </c><00:11:25.957><c>by</c> 00:11:26.040 --> 00:11:26.050 align:start position:0% So, this... You need to find "2-second turn" keywords. You can do this by 00:11:26.050 --> 00:11:26.910 align:start position:0% So, this... You need to find "2-second turn" keywords. You can do this by 00:11:26.910 --> 00:11:26.920 align:start position:0% 00:11:26.920 --> 00:11:33.580 align:start position:0% visiting <00:11:27.193><c>"20 </c><00:11:27.466><c>Marketing </c><00:11:27.739><c>Nap," </c><00:11:28.012><c>which </c><00:11:28.285><c>I </c><00:11:28.558><c>created. </c><00:11:28.831><c>There, </c><00:11:29.104><c>the</c> 00:11:33.580 --> 00:11:33.590 align:start position:0% 00:11:33.590 --> 00:11:37.750 align:start position:0% keyword <00:11:34.262><c>search </c><00:11:34.934><c>program </c><00:11:35.606><c>is </c><00:11:36.278><c>free; </c><00:11:36.950><c>you</c> 00:11:37.750 --> 00:11:37.760 align:start position:0% keyword search program is free; you 00:11:37.760 --> 00:11:42.220 align:start position:0% keyword search program is free; you just <00:11:37.941><c>need </c><00:11:38.122><c>to </c><00:11:38.303><c>perform </c><00:11:38.484><c>a </c><00:11:38.665><c>search </c><00:11:38.846><c>to </c><00:11:39.027><c>find </c><00:11:39.208><c>them. </c><00:11:39.389><c>So, </c><00:11:39.570><c>if </c><00:11:39.751><c>you </c><00:11:39.932><c>determine </c><00:11:40.113><c>that </c><00:11:40.294><c>the </c><00:11:40.475><c>keyword </c><00:11:40.656><c>you </c><00:11:40.837><c>want </c><00:11:41.018><c>in </c><00:11:41.199><c>your </c><00:11:41.380><c>desired </c><00:11:41.561><c>category </c><00:11:41.742><c>is </c><00:11:41.923><c>a </c><00:11:42.104><c>"suitable</c> 00:11:42.220 --> 00:11:42.230 align:start position:0% just need to perform a search to find them. So, if you determine that the keyword you want in your desired category is a "suitable 00:11:42.230 --> 00:11:47.110 align:start position:0% just need to perform a search to find them. So, if you determine that the keyword you want in your desired category is a "suitable keyword" <00:11:42.920><c>or </c><00:11:43.610><c>a </c><00:11:44.300><c>"symbiotic </c><00:11:44.990><c>keyword," </c><00:11:45.680><c>you </c><00:11:46.370><c>should</c> 00:11:47.110 --> 00:11:47.120 align:start position:0% keyword" or a "symbiotic keyword," you should 00:11:47.120 --> 00:11:51.220 align:start position:0% keyword" or a "symbiotic keyword," you should start <00:11:47.551><c>registering </c><00:11:47.982><c>that </c><00:11:48.413><c>product </c><00:11:48.844><c>without </c><00:11:49.275><c>paying </c><00:11:49.706><c>20 </c><00:11:50.137><c>elsewhere. </c><00:11:50.568><c>As</c> 00:11:51.220 --> 00:11:51.230 align:start position:0% start registering that product without paying 20 elsewhere. As 00:11:51.230 --> 00:11:55.420 align:start position:0% start registering that product without paying 20 elsewhere. As I <00:11:52.190><c>mentioned </c><00:11:53.150><c>regarding </c><00:11:54.110><c>upcoming </c><00:11:55.070><c>events,</c> 00:11:55.420 --> 00:11:55.430 align:start position:0% I mentioned regarding upcoming events, 00:11:55.430 --> 00:12:00.040 align:start position:0% I mentioned regarding upcoming events, I <00:11:55.676><c>host </c><00:11:55.922><c>a </c><00:11:56.168><c>live </c><00:11:56.414><c>stream </c><00:11:56.660><c>every </c><00:11:56.906><c>Thursday </c><00:11:57.152><c>at </c><00:11:57.398><c>10 </c><00:11:57.644><c>PM, </c><00:11:57.890><c>and </c><00:11:58.136><c>many </c><00:11:58.382><c>people </c><00:11:58.628><c>find </c><00:11:58.874><c>and </c><00:11:59.120><c>receive </c><00:11:59.366><c>"Gold" </c><00:11:59.612><c>keywords </c><00:11:59.858><c>there.</c> 00:12:00.040 --> 00:12:00.050 align:start position:0% I host a live stream every Thursday at 10 PM, and many people find and receive "Gold" keywords there. 00:12:00.050 --> 00:12:01.270 align:start position:0% I host a live stream every Thursday at 10 PM, and many people find and receive "Gold" keywords there. 00:12:01.270 --> 00:12:01.280 align:start position:0% 00:12:01.280 --> 00:12:04.810 align:start position:0% If <00:12:01.415><c>you </c><00:12:01.550><c>watch, </c><00:12:01.685><c>you'll </c><00:12:01.820><c>see </c><00:12:01.955><c>people </c><00:12:02.090><c>generating </c><00:12:02.225><c>sales </c><00:12:02.360><c>with </c><00:12:02.495><c>the </c><00:12:02.630><c>keywords </c><00:12:02.765><c>they </c><00:12:02.900><c>receive, </c><00:12:03.035><c>achieving </c><00:12:03.170><c>success, </c><00:12:03.305><c>and </c><00:12:03.440><c>discovering </c><00:12:03.575><c>them </c><00:12:03.710><c>themselves. </c><00:12:03.845><c>As </c><00:12:03.980><c>a </c><00:12:04.115><c>result,</c> 00:12:04.810 --> 00:12:04.820 align:start position:0% If you watch, you'll see people generating sales with the keywords they receive, achieving success, and discovering them themselves. As a result, 00:12:04.820 --> 00:12:09.670 align:start position:0% If you watch, you'll see people generating sales with the keywords they receive, achieving success, and discovering them themselves. As a result, many <00:12:05.600><c>"Power </c><00:12:06.380><c>B" </c><00:12:07.160><c>users </c><00:12:07.940><c>are </c><00:12:08.720><c>emerging.</c> 00:12:09.670 --> 00:12:09.680 align:start position:0% many "Power B" users are emerging. 00:12:09.680 --> 00:12:13.740 align:start position:0% many "Power B" users are emerging. Therefore, <00:12:09.950><c>if </c><00:12:10.220><c>you </c><00:12:10.490><c>clearly </c><00:12:10.760><c>understand </c><00:12:11.030><c>this </c><00:12:11.300><c>concept,</c> 00:12:13.740 --> 00:12:13.750 align:start position:0% Therefore, if you clearly understand this concept, 00:12:13.750 --> 00:12:17.670 align:start position:0% Therefore, if you clearly understand this concept, you <00:12:13.938><c>can </c><00:12:14.126><c>go </c><00:12:14.314><c>straight </c><00:12:14.502><c>to </c><00:12:14.690><c>"20 </c><00:12:14.878><c>Marketing" </c><00:12:15.066><c>and </c><00:12:15.254><c>discover </c><00:12:15.442><c>keywords </c><00:12:15.630><c>in </c><00:12:15.818><c>the </c><00:12:16.006><c>Goli </c><00:12:16.194><c>keyword </c><00:12:16.382><c>category. </c><00:12:16.570><c>However, </c><00:12:16.758><c>if </c><00:12:16.946><c>you </c><00:12:17.134><c>find</c> 00:12:17.670 --> 00:12:19.170 align:start position:0% you can go straight to "20 Marketing" and discover keywords in the Goli keyword category. However, if you find 00:12:19.170 --> 00:12:19.180 align:start position:0% 00:12:19.180 --> 00:12:22.650 align:start position:0% this <00:12:19.417><c>difficult—if </c><00:12:19.654><c>you </c><00:12:19.891><c>don't </c><00:12:20.128><c>understand </c><00:12:20.365><c>what </c><00:12:20.602><c>this </c><00:12:20.839><c>means, </c><00:12:21.076><c>or </c><00:12:21.313><c>if </c><00:12:21.550><c>you </c><00:12:21.787><c>don't </c><00:12:22.024><c>get </c><00:12:22.261><c>the </c><00:12:22.498><c>graphs,</c> 00:12:22.650 --> 00:12:22.660 align:start position:0% this difficult—if you don't understand what this means, or if you don't get the graphs, 00:12:22.660 --> 00:12:27.180 align:start position:0% this difficult—if you don't understand what this means, or if you don't get the graphs, introduction <00:12:23.126><c>phase, </c><00:12:23.592><c>growth </c><00:12:24.058><c>phase, </c><00:12:24.524><c>etc.—you </c><00:12:24.990><c>can </c><00:12:25.456><c>come </c><00:12:25.922><c>to </c><00:12:26.388><c>my </c><00:12:26.854><c>live</c> 00:12:27.180 --> 00:12:27.190 align:start position:0% introduction phase, growth phase, etc.—you can come to my live 00:12:27.190 --> 00:12:31.290 align:start position:0% introduction phase, growth phase, etc.—you can come to my live stream <00:12:27.519><c>to </c><00:12:27.848><c>ask </c><00:12:28.177><c>questions, </c><00:12:28.506><c>or </c><00:12:28.835><c>if </c><00:12:29.164><c>you </c><00:12:29.493><c>provide </c><00:12:29.822><c>me </c><00:12:30.151><c>with </c><00:12:30.480><c>your </c><00:12:30.809><c>category, </c><00:12:31.138><c>I</c> 00:12:31.290 --> 00:12:31.300 align:start position:0% stream to ask questions, or if you provide me with your category, I 00:12:31.300 --> 00:12:33.600 align:start position:0% stream to ask questions, or if you provide me with your category, I will <00:12:31.414><c>analyze </c><00:12:31.528><c>it </c><00:12:31.642><c>for </c><00:12:31.756><c>you </c><00:12:31.870><c>right </c><00:12:31.984><c>on </c><00:12:32.098><c>the </c><00:12:32.212><c>spot. </c><00:12:32.326><c>You </c><00:12:32.440><c>can</c> 00:12:33.600 --> 00:12:33.610 align:start position:0% will analyze it for you right on the spot. You can 00:12:33.610 --> 00:12:37.590 align:start position:0% will analyze it for you right on the spot. You can then <00:12:33.836><c>verify </c><00:12:34.062><c>it. </c><00:12:34.288><c>Now, </c><00:12:34.514><c>once </c><00:12:34.740><c>the </c><00:12:34.966><c>"2-second </c><00:12:35.192><c>turn" </c><00:12:35.418><c>keyword </c><00:12:35.644><c>has </c><00:12:35.870><c>been </c><00:12:36.096><c>identified, </c><00:12:36.322><c>if </c><00:12:36.548><c>you </c><00:12:36.774><c>type </c><00:12:37.000><c>it </c><00:12:37.226><c>in...</c> 00:12:37.590 --> 00:12:37.600 align:start position:0% then verify it. Now, once the "2-second turn" keyword has been identified, if you type it in... 00:12:37.600 --> 00:12:40.530 align:start position:0% then verify it. Now, once the "2-second turn" keyword has been identified, if you type it in... So, <00:12:37.756><c>where </c><00:12:37.912><c>do </c><00:12:38.068><c>we </c><00:12:38.224><c>need </c><00:12:38.380><c>to </c><00:12:38.536><c>move </c><00:12:38.692><c>on? </c><00:12:38.848><c>Since </c><00:12:39.004><c>I'm</c> 00:12:40.530 --> 00:12:40.540 align:start position:0% So, where do we need to move on? Since I'm 00:12:40.540 --> 00:12:44.430 align:start position:0% So, where do we need to move on? Since I'm teaching <00:12:40.919><c>you </c><00:12:41.298><c>how </c><00:12:41.677><c>to </c><00:12:42.056><c>utilize </c><00:12:42.435><c>Gold </c><00:12:42.814><c>Keywords, </c><00:12:43.193><c>I've </c><00:12:43.572><c>noticed </c><00:12:43.951><c>that</c> 00:12:44.430 --> 00:12:44.440 align:start position:0% teaching you how to utilize Gold Keywords, I've noticed that 00:12:44.440 --> 00:12:49.199 align:start position:0% teaching you how to utilize Gold Keywords, I've noticed that many <00:12:44.581><c>people </c><00:12:44.722><c>just </c><00:12:44.863><c>glance </c><00:12:45.004><c>at </c><00:12:45.145><c>the </c><00:12:45.286><c>keywords </c><00:12:45.427><c>without </c><00:12:45.568><c>actually </c><00:12:45.709><c>reading </c><00:12:45.850><c>them. </c><00:12:45.991><c>However, </c><00:12:46.132><c>the </c><00:12:46.273><c>important </c><00:12:46.414><c>thing </c><00:12:46.555><c>is </c><00:12:46.696><c>that </c><00:12:46.837><c>you </c><00:12:46.978><c>must </c><00:12:47.119><c>take </c><00:12:47.260><c>notes </c><00:12:47.401><c>on </c><00:12:47.542><c>them </c><00:12:47.683><c>and </c><00:12:47.824><c>track </c><00:12:47.965><c>them. </c><00:12:48.106><c>This </c><00:12:48.247><c>is </c><00:12:48.388><c>because </c><00:12:48.529><c>the</c> 00:12:49.199 --> 00:12:52.110 align:start position:0% many people just glance at the keywords without actually reading them. However, the important thing is that you must take notes on them and track them. This is because the 00:12:52.110 --> 00:12:52.120 align:start position:0% 00:12:52.120 --> 00:12:56.310 align:start position:0% rankings <00:12:52.383><c>of </c><00:12:52.646><c>Gold </c><00:12:52.909><c>Keywords </c><00:12:53.172><c>fluctuate </c><00:12:53.435><c>frequently, </c><00:12:53.698><c>so </c><00:12:53.961><c>if </c><00:12:54.224><c>you </c><00:12:54.487><c>don't </c><00:12:54.750><c>keep </c><00:12:55.013><c>a </c><00:12:55.276><c>good </c><00:12:55.539><c>record, </c><00:12:55.802><c>you</c> 00:12:56.310 --> 00:12:56.320 align:start position:0% rankings of Gold Keywords fluctuate frequently, so if you don't keep a good record, you 00:12:56.320 --> 00:12:59.250 align:start position:0% rankings of Gold Keywords fluctuate frequently, so if you don't keep a good record, you often <00:12:56.474><c>won't </c><00:12:56.628><c>remember </c><00:12:56.782><c>which </c><00:12:56.936><c>keywords </c><00:12:57.090><c>you </c><00:12:57.244><c>were </c><00:12:57.398><c>closely </c><00:12:57.552><c>watching. </c><00:12:57.706><c>For </c><00:12:57.860><c>instance, </c><00:12:58.014><c>there </c><00:12:58.168><c>might </c><00:12:58.322><c>be </c><00:12:58.476><c>"</c> 00:12:59.250 --> 00:12:59.260 align:start position:0% often won't remember which keywords you were closely watching. For instance, there might be " 00:12:59.260 --> 00:13:03.660 align:start position:0% often won't remember which keywords you were closely watching. For instance, there might be " Major <00:12:59.844><c>Issues" </c><00:13:00.428><c>or </c><00:13:01.012><c>"Machine," </c><00:13:01.596><c>or </c><00:13:02.180><c>during </c><00:13:02.764><c>the</c> 00:13:03.660 --> 00:13:03.670 align:start position:0% Major Issues" or "Machine," or during the 00:13:03.670 --> 00:13:07.010 align:start position:0% Major Issues" or "Machine," or during the year-end <00:13:04.067><c>and </c><00:13:04.464><c>New </c><00:13:04.861><c>Year </c><00:13:05.258><c>holidays,</c> 00:13:07.010 --> 00:13:09.420 align:start position:0% year-end and New Year holidays, 00:13:09.420 --> 00:13:09.430 align:start position:0% 00:13:09.430 --> 00:13:14.100 align:start position:0% there <00:13:09.584><c>are </c><00:13:09.738><c>keywords </c><00:13:09.892><c>like </c><00:13:10.046><c>"New </c><00:13:10.200><c>Year's </c><00:13:10.354><c>Resolutions </c><00:13:10.508><c>That </c><00:13:10.662><c>Last </c><00:13:10.816><c>Three </c><00:13:10.970><c>Days"—the </c><00:13:11.124><c>"Top </c><00:13:11.278><c>21." </c><00:13:11.432><c>You </c><00:13:11.586><c>need </c><00:13:11.740><c>to </c><00:13:11.894><c>write </c><00:13:12.048><c>down </c><00:13:12.202><c>every </c><00:13:12.356><c>single </c><00:13:12.510><c>one </c><00:13:12.664><c>of </c><00:13:12.818><c>these </c><00:13:12.972><c>keywords </c><00:13:13.126><c>whenever </c><00:13:13.280><c>you </c><00:13:13.434><c>track </c><00:13:13.588><c>the </c><00:13:13.742><c>corresponding </c><00:13:13.896><c>keyboards.</c> 00:13:14.100 --> 00:13:16.830 align:start position:0% there are keywords like "New Year's Resolutions That Last Three Days"—the "Top 21." You need to write down every single one of these keywords whenever you track the corresponding keyboards. 00:13:16.830 --> 00:13:21.570 align:start position:0% 00:13:21.570 --> 00:13:21.580 align:start position:0% 00:13:21.580 --> 00:13:24.290 align:start position:0% 00:13:24.290 --> 00:13:27.350 align:start position:0% 00:13:27.350 --> 00:13:27.360 align:start position:0% 00:13:27.360 --> 00:13:31.790 align:start position:0% Once <00:13:27.458><c>you </c><00:13:27.556><c>have </c><00:13:27.654><c>written </c><00:13:27.752><c>down </c><00:13:27.850><c>all </c><00:13:27.948><c>these </c><00:13:28.046><c>keywords </c><00:13:28.144><c>and </c><00:13:28.242><c>categorized </c><00:13:28.340><c>them </c><00:13:28.438><c>to </c><00:13:28.536><c>see </c><00:13:28.634><c>if </c><00:13:28.732><c>they </c><00:13:28.830><c>are </c><00:13:28.928><c>trending </c><00:13:29.026><c>upwards </c><00:13:29.124><c>or </c><00:13:29.222><c>downwards, </c><00:13:29.320><c>you </c><00:13:29.418><c>can </c><00:13:29.516><c>set </c><00:13:29.614><c>up </c><00:13:29.712><c>the </c><00:13:29.810><c>keywords </c><00:13:29.908><c>that </c><00:13:30.006><c>are </c><00:13:30.104><c>exactly </c><00:13:30.202><c>where </c><00:13:30.300><c>you </c><00:13:30.398><c>will </c><00:13:30.496><c>invest </c><00:13:30.594><c>money </c><00:13:30.692><c>to </c><00:13:30.790><c>purchase </c><00:13:30.888><c>inventory</c> 00:13:31.790 --> 00:13:31.800 align:start position:0% Once you have written down all these keywords and categorized them to see if they are trending upwards or downwards, you can set up the keywords that are exactly where you will invest money to purchase inventory 00:13:31.800 --> 00:13:37.670 align:start position:0% Once you have written down all these keywords and categorized them to see if they are trending upwards or downwards, you can set up the keywords that are exactly where you will invest money to purchase inventory or <00:13:32.910><c>register </c><00:13:34.020><c>products. </c><00:13:35.130><c>If </c><00:13:36.240><c>you</c> 00:13:37.670 --> 00:13:37.680 align:start position:0% or register products. If you 00:13:37.680 --> 00:13:43.040 align:start position:0% or register products. If you continue <00:13:38.154><c>registering </c><00:13:38.628><c>and </c><00:13:39.102><c>studying </c><00:13:39.576><c>this </c><00:13:40.050><c>throughout </c><00:13:40.524><c>February, </c><00:13:40.998><c>March, </c><00:13:41.472><c>and </c><00:13:41.946><c>April, </c><00:13:42.420><c>you</c> 00:13:43.040 --> 00:13:48.170 align:start position:0% continue registering and studying this throughout February, March, and April, you 00:13:48.170 --> 00:13:48.180 align:start position:0% 00:13:48.180 --> 00:13:52.759 align:start position:0% can <00:13:48.304><c>check </c><00:13:48.428><c>whether </c><00:13:48.552><c>a </c><00:13:48.676><c>keyword </c><00:13:48.800><c>is </c><00:13:48.924><c>trending </c><00:13:49.048><c>upwards </c><00:13:49.172><c>and </c><00:13:49.296><c>allowing </c><00:13:49.420><c>you </c><00:13:49.544><c>to </c><00:13:49.668><c>track </c><00:13:49.792><c>its </c><00:13:49.916><c>tone </c><00:13:50.040><c>just </c><00:13:50.164><c>by </c><00:13:50.288><c>looking </c><00:13:50.412><c>at </c><00:13:50.536><c>the </c><00:13:50.660><c>graph. </c><00:13:50.784><c>Also, </c><00:13:50.908><c>because </c><00:13:51.032><c>you </c><00:13:51.156><c>have </c><00:13:51.280><c>already </c><00:13:51.404><c>checked </c><00:13:51.528><c>the </c><00:13:51.652><c>"cautionary </c><00:13:51.776><c>shoes" </c><00:13:51.900><c>in </c><00:13:52.024><c>advance, </c><00:13:52.148><c>you </c><00:13:52.272><c>can,</c> 00:13:52.759 --> 00:13:54.259 align:start position:0% can check whether a keyword is trending upwards and allowing you to track its tone just by looking at the graph. Also, because you have already checked the "cautionary shoes" in advance, you can, 00:13:54.259 --> 00:13:54.269 align:start position:0% 00:13:54.269 --> 00:13:58.759 align:start position:0% especially <00:13:54.588><c>regarding </c><00:13:54.907><c>consignment </c><00:13:55.226><c>or </c><00:13:55.545><c>overseas... </c><00:13:55.864><c>For </c><00:13:56.183><c>those </c><00:13:56.502><c>doing </c><00:13:56.821><c>purchasing </c><00:13:57.140><c>agency </c><00:13:57.459><c>work, </c><00:13:57.778><c>this</c> 00:13:58.759 --> 00:14:04.309 align:start position:0% especially regarding consignment or overseas... For those doing purchasing agency work, this 00:14:04.309 --> 00:14:04.319 align:start position:0% 00:14:04.319 --> 00:14:07.069 align:start position:0% serves <00:14:04.440><c>as </c><00:14:04.561><c>a </c><00:14:04.682><c>kind </c><00:14:04.803><c>of </c><00:14:04.924><c>planner </c><00:14:05.045><c>that </c><00:14:05.166><c>allows </c><00:14:05.287><c>you </c><00:14:05.408><c>to </c><00:14:05.529><c>capture </c><00:14:05.650><c>all </c><00:14:05.771><c>the </c><00:14:05.892><c>important </c><00:14:06.013><c>points </c><00:14:06.134><c>without </c><00:14:06.255><c>missing </c><00:14:06.376><c>anything.</c> 00:14:07.069 --> 00:14:07.079 align:start position:0% serves as a kind of planner that allows you to capture all the important points without missing anything. 00:14:07.079 --> 00:14:10.759 align:start position:0% serves as a kind of planner that allows you to capture all the important points without missing anything. If <00:14:07.446><c>you </c><00:14:07.813><c>create </c><00:14:08.180><c>this </c><00:14:08.547><c>planner </c><00:14:08.914><c>based </c><00:14:09.281><c>on </c><00:14:09.648><c>short-term </c><00:14:10.015><c>keywords,</c> 00:14:10.759 --> 00:14:10.769 align:start position:0% If you create this planner based on short-term keywords, 00:14:10.769 --> 00:14:15.170 align:start position:0% If you create this planner based on short-term keywords, you <00:14:11.016><c>won't </c><00:14:11.263><c>need </c><00:14:11.510><c>to </c><00:14:11.757><c>worry </c><00:14:12.004><c>about </c><00:14:12.251><c>what </c><00:14:12.498><c>to </c><00:14:12.745><c>register </c><00:14:12.992><c>or </c><00:14:13.239><c>what </c><00:14:13.486><c>products </c><00:14:13.733><c>to </c><00:14:13.980><c>source </c><00:14:14.227><c>every </c><00:14:14.474><c>month. </c><00:14:14.721><c>There </c><00:14:14.968><c>are</c> 00:14:15.170 --> 00:14:16.970 align:start position:0% you won't need to worry about what to register or what products to source every month. There are 00:14:16.970 --> 00:14:16.980 align:start position:0% 00:14:16.980 --> 00:14:21.259 align:start position:0% so <00:14:17.188><c>many </c><00:14:17.396><c>products </c><00:14:17.604><c>to </c><00:14:17.812><c>source </c><00:14:18.020><c>in </c><00:14:18.228><c>January, </c><00:14:18.436><c>February, </c><00:14:18.644><c>March, </c><00:14:18.852><c>and </c><00:14:19.060><c>April; </c><00:14:19.268><c>you </c><00:14:19.476><c>have </c><00:14:19.684><c>to </c><00:14:19.892><c>register </c><00:14:20.100><c>them </c><00:14:20.308><c>quickly </c><00:14:20.516><c>because </c><00:14:20.724><c>if </c><00:14:20.932><c>you</c> 00:14:21.259 --> 00:14:22.610 align:start position:0% so many products to source in January, February, March, and April; you have to register them quickly because if you 00:14:22.610 --> 00:14:22.620 align:start position:0% 00:14:22.620 --> 00:14:27.410 align:start position:0% leave <00:14:22.980><c>them </c><00:14:23.340><c>alone, </c><00:14:23.700><c>the </c><00:14:24.060><c>nights </c><00:14:24.420><c>will </c><00:14:24.780><c>grab </c><00:14:25.140><c>them. </c><00:14:25.500><c>So, </c><00:14:25.860><c>from </c><00:14:26.220><c>now </c><00:14:26.580><c>on, </c><00:14:26.940><c>once </c><00:14:27.300><c>you</c> 00:14:27.410 --> 00:14:27.420 align:start position:0% leave them alone, the nights will grab them. So, from now on, once you 00:14:27.420 --> 00:14:31.040 align:start position:0% leave them alone, the nights will grab them. So, from now on, once you understand <00:14:27.655><c>the </c><00:14:27.890><c>concept </c><00:14:28.125><c>of </c><00:14:28.360><c>a </c><00:14:28.595><c>planner—even </c><00:14:28.830><c>if </c><00:14:29.065><c>it </c><00:14:29.300><c>stands </c><00:14:29.535><c>out </c><00:14:29.770><c>as </c><00:14:30.005><c>a </c><00:14:30.240><c>"short-term </c><00:14:30.475><c>keyword"—you </c><00:14:30.710><c>wo</c> 00:14:31.040 --> 00:14:31.050 align:start position:0% understand the concept of a planner—even if it stands out as a "short-term keyword"—you wo 00:14:31.050 --> 00:14:31.939 align:start position:0% understand the concept of a planner—even if it stands out as a "short-term keyword"—you wo 00:14:31.939 --> 00:14:31.949 align:start position:0% 00:14:31.949 --> 00:14:35.720 align:start position:0% n't <00:14:32.164><c>ask </c><00:14:32.379><c>questions </c><00:14:32.594><c>like, </c><00:14:32.809><c>"What </c><00:14:33.024><c>should </c><00:14:33.239><c>I </c><00:14:33.454><c>announce?" </c><00:14:33.669><c>or </c><00:14:33.884><c>"What </c><00:14:34.099><c>should </c><00:14:34.314><c>I </c><00:14:34.529><c>source?" </c><00:14:34.744><c>Instead, </c><00:14:34.959><c>you </c><00:14:35.174><c>will </c><00:14:35.389><c>start</c> 00:14:35.720 --> 00:14:35.730 align:start position:0% n't ask questions like, "What should I announce?" or "What should I source?" Instead, you will start 00:14:35.730 --> 00:14:36.230 align:start position:0% n't ask questions like, "What should I announce?" or "What should I source?" Instead, you will start 00:14:36.230 --> 00:14:40.340 align:start position:0% 00:14:40.340 --> 00:14:40.350 align:start position:0% 00:14:40.350 --> 00:14:43.939 align:start position:0% asking <00:14:40.467><c>more </c><00:14:40.584><c>detailed </c><00:14:40.701><c>questions </c><00:14:40.818><c>like, </c><00:14:40.935><c>"The </c><00:14:41.052><c>keyword </c><00:14:41.169><c>is </c><00:14:41.286><c>trending </c><00:14:41.403><c>upwards, </c><00:14:41.520><c>should </c><00:14:41.637><c>I </c><00:14:41.754><c>really </c><00:14:41.871><c>use </c><00:14:41.988><c>it </c><00:14:42.105><c>as </c><00:14:42.222><c>a </c><00:14:42.339><c>goal </c><00:14:42.456><c>keyword? </c><00:14:42.573><c>When </c><00:14:42.690><c>will </c><00:14:42.807><c>it </c><00:14:42.924><c>take </c><00:14:43.041><c>off?"</c> 00:14:43.939 --> 00:14:43.949 align:start position:0% asking more detailed questions like, "The keyword is trending upwards, should I really use it as a goal keyword? When will it take off?" 00:14:43.949 --> 00:14:47.389 align:start position:0% asking more detailed questions like, "The keyword is trending upwards, should I really use it as a goal keyword? When will it take off?" So <00:14:44.191><c>far, </c><00:14:44.433><c>I </c><00:14:44.675><c>have </c><00:14:44.917><c>explained </c><00:14:45.159><c>short-term </c><00:14:45.401><c>keywords </c><00:14:45.643><c>and </c><00:14:45.885><c>keyword </c><00:14:46.127><c>planners. </c><00:14:46.369><c>You </c><00:14:46.611><c>might </c><00:14:46.853><c>wonder </c><00:14:47.095><c>what</c> 00:14:47.389 --> 00:14:47.399 align:start position:0% So far, I have explained short-term keywords and keyword planners. You might wonder what 00:14:47.399 --> 00:14:50.900 align:start position:0% So far, I have explained short-term keywords and keyword planners. You might wonder what this <00:14:47.696><c>person </c><00:14:47.993><c>is </c><00:14:48.290><c>talking </c><00:14:48.587><c>about </c><00:14:48.884><c>or </c><00:14:49.181><c>if </c><00:14:49.478><c>you </c><00:14:49.775><c>can </c><00:14:50.072><c>really </c><00:14:50.369><c>get </c><00:14:50.666><c>high</c> 00:14:50.900 --> 00:14:50.910 align:start position:0% this person is talking about or if you can really get high 00:14:50.910 --> 00:14:54.530 align:start position:0% this person is talking about or if you can really get high exposure <00:14:51.221><c>with </c><00:14:51.532><c>this, </c><00:14:51.843><c>but </c><00:14:52.154><c>I </c><00:14:52.465><c>am </c><00:14:52.776><c>not </c><00:14:53.087><c>selling </c><00:14:53.398><c>you </c><00:14:53.709><c>any </c><00:14:54.020><c>programs,</c> 00:14:54.530 --> 00:14:54.540 align:start position:0% exposure with this, but I am not selling you any programs, 00:14:54.540 --> 00:14:56.059 align:start position:0% exposure with this, but I am not selling you any programs, secret <00:14:55.350><c>methods,</c> 00:14:56.059 --> 00:14:56.069 align:start position:0% secret methods, 00:14:56.069 --> 00:14:59.660 align:start position:0% secret methods, or <00:14:56.257><c>things </c><00:14:56.445><c>only </c><00:14:56.633><c>I </c><00:14:56.821><c>know. </c><00:14:57.009><c>I </c><00:14:57.197><c>am </c><00:14:57.385><c>not </c><00:14:57.573><c>selling </c><00:14:57.761><c>any </c><00:14:57.949><c>kind </c><00:14:58.137><c>of </c><00:14:58.325><c>hacking. </c><00:14:58.513><c>I </c><00:14:58.701><c>am</c> 00:14:59.660 --> 00:15:02.509 align:start position:0% or things only I know. I am not selling any kind of hacking. I am 00:15:02.509 --> 00:15:02.519 align:start position:0% 00:15:02.519 --> 00:15:06.920 align:start position:0% explaining <00:15:02.787><c>analysis </c><00:15:03.055><c>methods </c><00:15:03.323><c>and </c><00:15:03.591><c>how </c><00:15:03.859><c>to </c><00:15:04.127><c>use </c><00:15:04.395><c>them </c><00:15:04.663><c>to </c><00:15:04.931><c>identify </c><00:15:05.199><c>savings </c><00:15:05.467><c>products </c><00:15:05.735><c>suitable </c><00:15:06.003><c>for </c><00:15:06.271><c>you, </c><00:15:06.539><c>and</c> 00:15:06.920 --> 00:15:06.930 align:start position:0% explaining analysis methods and how to use them to identify savings products suitable for you, and 00:15:06.930 --> 00:15:09.619 align:start position:0% explaining analysis methods and how to use them to identify savings products suitable for you, and I <00:15:07.326><c>am </c><00:15:07.722><c>providing </c><00:15:08.118><c>consulting </c><00:15:08.514><c>on </c><00:15:08.910><c>that.</c> 00:15:09.619 --> 00:15:09.629 align:start position:0% I am providing consulting on that. 00:15:09.629 --> 00:15:14.210 align:start position:0% I am providing consulting on that. Thank <00:15:09.833><c>you </c><00:15:10.037><c>for </c><00:15:10.241><c>watching </c><00:15:10.445><c>the </c><00:15:10.649><c>video </c><00:15:10.853><c>so </c><00:15:11.057><c>far. </c><00:15:11.261><c>My </c><00:15:11.465><c>channel </c><00:15:11.669><c>is </c><00:15:11.873><c>run </c><00:15:12.077><c>thanks </c><00:15:12.281><c>to </c><00:15:12.485><c>the </c><00:15:12.689><c>power </c><00:15:12.893><c>of </c><00:15:13.097><c>your </c><00:15:13.301><c>subscriptions </c><00:15:13.505><c>and </c><00:15:13.709><c>likes. </c><00:15:13.913><c>Please </c><00:15:14.117><c>make</c> 00:15:14.210 --> 00:15:14.220 align:start position:0% Thank you for watching the video so far. My channel is run thanks to the power of your subscriptions and likes. Please make 00:15:14.220 --> 00:15:19.250 align:start position:0% Thank you for watching the video so far. My channel is run thanks to the power of your subscriptions and likes. Please make sure <00:15:14.605><c>to </c><00:15:14.990><c>subscribe </c><00:15:15.375><c>and </c><00:15:15.760><c>support </c><00:15:16.145><c>me. </c><00:15:16.530><c>Thank </c><00:15:16.915><c>you.</c>