마케팅쉐어_이과장
내용
[subtitle-meta] lang=en auto=True
It is a bid price issue.
You know Naver ads, right? In the case of Power Link, it is an advertisement that scrolls down
sequentially from top to bottom due to this phenomenon
. Regardless of performance, the companies at the top
attract significantly more visitors than the companies at the bottom. Instagram ads
are also a platform where you scroll down to view them. If
the budget is high, the bid price is high. So,
people with high budgets
prioritize looking at my ads, so they start
debating whether to buy it as soon as they see it, whereas
people with low budgets watch all the competitors' ads first and then look at
mine
. Naturally, the conversion rate itself is bound to be
lower than that of those with higher budgets
. Performance is bound to get even lower
.
While some people get discouraged and cut the budget when results are poor, others actually
drastically increase the budget to boost exposure rankings when performance drops
. So, there
are cases where it actually covers up the achievements. It
is a targeting issue. Whether the bid price is low or
high, once I set up the ad, a specific
fence is assigned like this.
Within that fence, there are customers who will watch my ads, and
there are also competitors with similar ads. Will you fight inside that filthy mud fence of mine,
or have you ever seen me? Or
people with the same personality as the person who bought mine. Will you fight inside a clean fence
? If ad performance
doesn't improve immediately, you should also question your targeting
. Okay, this is the first one
. Most of the campaigns with excellent advertising performance are the ones where
I
incorporated interests. As for interest-
based non-targeting, this is... You only do this when you're a beginner
. I only run Meta ads when I'm a beginner with no data;
later on,
how do real experts hit 2,000% or 3,000% ROAS? It is one of
various targeting techniques, specifically retargeting ads that are sent to
people who have visited my homepage
. Now,
secondly,
offline options are also available even without a website. You can
target that person's cell phone just by knowing their phone number
.
It's Instagram account targeting. I can target and shoot ads to people who have
visited my profile or have posted on
Jodaegong, even if they haven't followed me
. The results were very
good. Try to find another person who has the same behavioral patterns as the person who bought my item
.
원문 자막 펼치기
WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.270 align:start position:0% It <00:00:00.512><c>is </c><00:00:00.904><c>a </c><00:00:01.296><c>bid </c><00:00:01.688><c>price </c><00:00:02.080><c>issue.</c> 00:00:02.270 --> 00:00:02.280 align:start position:0% It is a bid price issue. 00:00:02.280 --> 00:00:04.030 align:start position:0% It is a bid price issue. You <00:00:02.367><c>know </c><00:00:02.454><c>Naver </c><00:00:02.541><c>ads, </c><00:00:02.628><c>right? </c><00:00:02.715><c>In </c><00:00:02.802><c>the </c><00:00:02.889><c>case </c><00:00:02.976><c>of </c><00:00:03.063><c>Power </c><00:00:03.150><c>Link, </c><00:00:03.237><c>it </c><00:00:03.324><c>is </c><00:00:03.411><c>an </c><00:00:03.498><c>advertisement </c><00:00:03.585><c>that </c><00:00:03.672><c>scrolls </c><00:00:03.759><c>down</c> 00:00:04.030 --> 00:00:04.040 align:start position:0% You know Naver ads, right? In the case of Power Link, it is an advertisement that scrolls down 00:00:04.040 --> 00:00:07.510 align:start position:0% You know Naver ads, right? In the case of Power Link, it is an advertisement that scrolls down sequentially <00:00:04.345><c>from </c><00:00:04.650><c>top </c><00:00:04.955><c>to </c><00:00:05.260><c>bottom </c><00:00:05.565><c>due </c><00:00:05.870><c>to </c><00:00:06.175><c>this </c><00:00:06.480><c>phenomenon</c> 00:00:07.510 --> 00:00:07.520 align:start position:0% sequentially from top to bottom due to this phenomenon 00:00:07.520 --> 00:00:09.910 align:start position:0% sequentially from top to bottom due to this phenomenon . <00:00:07.784><c>Regardless </c><00:00:08.048><c>of </c><00:00:08.312><c>performance, </c><00:00:08.576><c>the </c><00:00:08.840><c>companies </c><00:00:09.104><c>at </c><00:00:09.368><c>the </c><00:00:09.632><c>top</c> 00:00:09.910 --> 00:00:12.509 align:start position:0% . Regardless of performance, the companies at the top 00:00:12.509 --> 00:00:14.950 align:start position:0% 00:00:14.950 --> 00:00:14.960 align:start position:0% 00:00:14.960 --> 00:00:16.590 align:start position:0% attract <00:00:15.090><c>significantly </c><00:00:15.220><c>more </c><00:00:15.350><c>visitors </c><00:00:15.480><c>than </c><00:00:15.610><c>the </c><00:00:15.740><c>companies </c><00:00:15.870><c>at </c><00:00:16.000><c>the </c><00:00:16.130><c>bottom. </c><00:00:16.260><c>Instagram </c><00:00:16.390><c>ads</c> 00:00:16.590 --> 00:00:16.600 align:start position:0% attract significantly more visitors than the companies at the bottom. Instagram ads 00:00:16.600 --> 00:00:19.269 align:start position:0% attract significantly more visitors than the companies at the bottom. Instagram ads are <00:00:16.774><c>also </c><00:00:16.948><c>a </c><00:00:17.122><c>platform </c><00:00:17.296><c>where </c><00:00:17.470><c>you </c><00:00:17.644><c>scroll </c><00:00:17.818><c>down </c><00:00:17.992><c>to </c><00:00:18.166><c>view </c><00:00:18.340><c>them. </c><00:00:18.514><c>If</c> 00:00:19.269 --> 00:00:19.279 align:start position:0% are also a platform where you scroll down to view them. If 00:00:19.279 --> 00:00:22.509 align:start position:0% are also a platform where you scroll down to view them. If the <00:00:19.599><c>budget </c><00:00:19.919><c>is </c><00:00:20.239><c>high, </c><00:00:20.559><c>the </c><00:00:20.879><c>bid </c><00:00:21.199><c>price </c><00:00:21.519><c>is </c><00:00:21.839><c>high. </c><00:00:22.159><c>So,</c> 00:00:22.509 --> 00:00:22.519 align:start position:0% the budget is high, the bid price is high. So, 00:00:22.519 --> 00:00:24.670 align:start position:0% the budget is high, the bid price is high. So, people <00:00:23.119><c>with </c><00:00:23.719><c>high </c><00:00:24.319><c>budgets</c> 00:00:24.670 --> 00:00:24.680 align:start position:0% people with high budgets 00:00:24.680 --> 00:00:26.830 align:start position:0% people with high budgets prioritize <00:00:24.908><c>looking </c><00:00:25.136><c>at </c><00:00:25.364><c>my </c><00:00:25.592><c>ads, </c><00:00:25.820><c>so </c><00:00:26.048><c>they </c><00:00:26.276><c>start</c> 00:00:26.830 --> 00:00:28.550 align:start position:0% prioritize looking at my ads, so they start 00:00:28.550 --> 00:00:28.560 align:start position:0% 00:00:28.560 --> 00:00:30.830 align:start position:0% debating <00:00:28.730><c>whether </c><00:00:28.900><c>to </c><00:00:29.070><c>buy </c><00:00:29.240><c>it </c><00:00:29.410><c>as </c><00:00:29.580><c>soon </c><00:00:29.750><c>as </c><00:00:29.920><c>they </c><00:00:30.090><c>see </c><00:00:30.260><c>it, </c><00:00:30.430><c>whereas</c> 00:00:30.830 --> 00:00:30.840 align:start position:0% debating whether to buy it as soon as they see it, whereas 00:00:30.840 --> 00:00:33.150 align:start position:0% debating whether to buy it as soon as they see it, whereas people <00:00:31.000><c>with </c><00:00:31.160><c>low </c><00:00:31.320><c>budgets </c><00:00:31.480><c>watch </c><00:00:31.640><c>all </c><00:00:31.800><c>the </c><00:00:31.960><c>competitors' </c><00:00:32.120><c>ads </c><00:00:32.280><c>first </c><00:00:32.440><c>and </c><00:00:32.600><c>then </c><00:00:32.760><c>look </c><00:00:32.920><c>at</c> 00:00:33.150 --> 00:00:33.160 align:start position:0% people with low budgets watch all the competitors' ads first and then look at 00:00:33.160 --> 00:00:34.549 align:start position:0% people with low budgets watch all the competitors' ads first and then look at mine 00:00:34.549 --> 00:00:34.559 align:start position:0% mine 00:00:34.559 --> 00:00:37.110 align:start position:0% mine . <00:00:34.799><c>Naturally, </c><00:00:35.039><c>the </c><00:00:35.279><c>conversion </c><00:00:35.519><c>rate </c><00:00:35.759><c>itself </c><00:00:35.999><c>is </c><00:00:36.239><c>bound </c><00:00:36.479><c>to </c><00:00:36.719><c>be</c> 00:00:37.110 --> 00:00:37.120 align:start position:0% . Naturally, the conversion rate itself is bound to be 00:00:37.120 --> 00:00:38.990 align:start position:0% . Naturally, the conversion rate itself is bound to be lower <00:00:37.342><c>than </c><00:00:37.564><c>that </c><00:00:37.786><c>of </c><00:00:38.008><c>those </c><00:00:38.230><c>with </c><00:00:38.452><c>higher </c><00:00:38.674><c>budgets</c> 00:00:38.990 --> 00:00:39.000 align:start position:0% lower than that of those with higher budgets 00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:41.590 align:start position:0% lower than that of those with higher budgets . <00:00:39.314><c>Performance </c><00:00:39.628><c>is </c><00:00:39.942><c>bound </c><00:00:40.256><c>to </c><00:00:40.570><c>get </c><00:00:40.884><c>even </c><00:00:41.198><c>lower</c> 00:00:41.590 --> 00:00:41.600 align:start position:0% . Performance is bound to get even lower 00:00:41.600 --> 00:00:43.190 align:start position:0% . Performance is bound to get even lower . 00:00:43.190 --> 00:00:43.200 align:start position:0% . 00:00:43.200 --> 00:00:45.029 align:start position:0% . While <00:00:43.297><c>some </c><00:00:43.394><c>people </c><00:00:43.491><c>get </c><00:00:43.588><c>discouraged </c><00:00:43.685><c>and </c><00:00:43.782><c>cut </c><00:00:43.879><c>the </c><00:00:43.976><c>budget </c><00:00:44.073><c>when </c><00:00:44.170><c>results </c><00:00:44.267><c>are </c><00:00:44.364><c>poor, </c><00:00:44.461><c>others </c><00:00:44.558><c>actually</c> 00:00:45.029 --> 00:00:45.039 align:start position:0% While some people get discouraged and cut the budget when results are poor, others actually 00:00:45.039 --> 00:00:47.029 align:start position:0% While some people get discouraged and cut the budget when results are poor, others actually drastically <00:00:45.227><c>increase </c><00:00:45.415><c>the </c><00:00:45.603><c>budget </c><00:00:45.791><c>to </c><00:00:45.979><c>boost </c><00:00:46.167><c>exposure </c><00:00:46.355><c>rankings </c><00:00:46.543><c>when </c><00:00:46.731><c>performance </c><00:00:46.919><c>drops</c> 00:00:47.029 --> 00:00:48.790 align:start position:0% drastically increase the budget to boost exposure rankings when performance drops 00:00:48.790 --> 00:00:48.800 align:start position:0% 00:00:48.800 --> 00:00:50.709 align:start position:0% . <00:00:49.660><c>So, </c><00:00:50.520><c>there</c> 00:00:50.709 --> 00:00:50.719 align:start position:0% . So, there 00:00:50.719 --> 00:00:52.310 align:start position:0% . So, there are <00:00:50.843><c>cases </c><00:00:50.967><c>where </c><00:00:51.091><c>it </c><00:00:51.215><c>actually </c><00:00:51.339><c>covers </c><00:00:51.463><c>up </c><00:00:51.587><c>the </c><00:00:51.711><c>achievements. </c><00:00:51.835><c>It</c> 00:00:52.310 --> 00:00:52.320 align:start position:0% are cases where it actually covers up the achievements. It 00:00:52.320 --> 00:00:54.470 align:start position:0% are cases where it actually covers up the achievements. It is <00:00:52.504><c>a </c><00:00:52.688><c>targeting </c><00:00:52.872><c>issue. </c><00:00:53.056><c>Whether </c><00:00:53.240><c>the </c><00:00:53.424><c>bid </c><00:00:53.608><c>price </c><00:00:53.792><c>is </c><00:00:53.976><c>low </c><00:00:54.160><c>or</c> 00:00:54.470 --> 00:00:54.480 align:start position:0% is a targeting issue. Whether the bid price is low or 00:00:54.480 --> 00:00:56.670 align:start position:0% is a targeting issue. Whether the bid price is low or high, <00:00:54.710><c>once </c><00:00:54.940><c>I </c><00:00:55.170><c>set </c><00:00:55.400><c>up </c><00:00:55.630><c>the </c><00:00:55.860><c>ad, </c><00:00:56.090><c>a </c><00:00:56.320><c>specific</c> 00:00:56.670 --> 00:00:56.680 align:start position:0% high, once I set up the ad, a specific 00:00:56.680 --> 00:00:58.189 align:start position:0% high, once I set up the ad, a specific fence <00:00:57.010><c>is </c><00:00:57.340><c>assigned </c><00:00:57.670><c>like </c><00:00:58.000><c>this.</c> 00:00:58.189 --> 00:00:58.199 align:start position:0% fence is assigned like this. 00:00:58.199 --> 00:01:00.389 align:start position:0% fence is assigned like this. Within <00:00:58.366><c>that </c><00:00:58.533><c>fence, </c><00:00:58.700><c>there </c><00:00:58.867><c>are </c><00:00:59.034><c>customers </c><00:00:59.201><c>who </c><00:00:59.368><c>will </c><00:00:59.535><c>watch </c><00:00:59.702><c>my </c><00:00:59.869><c>ads, </c><00:01:00.036><c>and</c> 00:01:00.389 --> 00:01:02.670 align:start position:0% Within that fence, there are customers who will watch my ads, and 00:01:02.670 --> 00:01:02.680 align:start position:0% 00:01:02.680 --> 00:01:05.630 align:start position:0% there <00:01:02.842><c>are </c><00:01:03.004><c>also </c><00:01:03.166><c>competitors </c><00:01:03.328><c>with </c><00:01:03.490><c>similar </c><00:01:03.652><c>ads. </c><00:01:03.814><c>Will </c><00:01:03.976><c>you </c><00:01:04.138><c>fight </c><00:01:04.300><c>inside </c><00:01:04.462><c>that </c><00:01:04.624><c>filthy </c><00:01:04.786><c>mud </c><00:01:04.948><c>fence </c><00:01:05.110><c>of </c><00:01:05.272><c>mine,</c> 00:01:05.630 --> 00:01:07.950 align:start position:0% there are also competitors with similar ads. Will you fight inside that filthy mud fence of mine, 00:01:07.950 --> 00:01:07.960 align:start position:0% 00:01:07.960 --> 00:01:10.550 align:start position:0% or <00:01:08.293><c>have </c><00:01:08.626><c>you </c><00:01:08.959><c>ever </c><00:01:09.292><c>seen </c><00:01:09.625><c>me? </c><00:01:09.958><c>Or</c> 00:01:10.550 --> 00:01:13.030 align:start position:0% or have you ever seen me? Or 00:01:13.030 --> 00:01:13.040 align:start position:0% 00:01:13.040 --> 00:01:14.870 align:start position:0% people <00:01:13.129><c>with </c><00:01:13.218><c>the </c><00:01:13.307><c>same </c><00:01:13.396><c>personality </c><00:01:13.485><c>as </c><00:01:13.574><c>the </c><00:01:13.663><c>person </c><00:01:13.752><c>who </c><00:01:13.841><c>bought </c><00:01:13.930><c>mine. </c><00:01:14.019><c>Will </c><00:01:14.108><c>you </c><00:01:14.197><c>fight </c><00:01:14.286><c>inside </c><00:01:14.375><c>a </c><00:01:14.464><c>clean </c><00:01:14.553><c>fence</c> 00:01:14.870 --> 00:01:14.880 align:start position:0% people with the same personality as the person who bought mine. Will you fight inside a clean fence 00:01:14.880 --> 00:01:16.469 align:start position:0% people with the same personality as the person who bought mine. Will you fight inside a clean fence ? <00:01:15.293><c>If </c><00:01:15.706><c>ad </c><00:01:16.119><c>performance</c> 00:01:16.469 --> 00:01:16.479 align:start position:0% ? If ad performance 00:01:16.479 --> 00:01:18.630 align:start position:0% ? If ad performance doesn't <00:01:16.649><c>improve </c><00:01:16.819><c>immediately, </c><00:01:16.989><c>you </c><00:01:17.159><c>should </c><00:01:17.329><c>also </c><00:01:17.499><c>question </c><00:01:17.669><c>your </c><00:01:17.839><c>targeting</c> 00:01:18.630 --> 00:01:18.640 align:start position:0% doesn't improve immediately, you should also question your targeting 00:01:18.640 --> 00:01:20.390 align:start position:0% doesn't improve immediately, you should also question your targeting . <00:01:18.906><c>Okay, </c><00:01:19.172><c>this </c><00:01:19.438><c>is </c><00:01:19.704><c>the </c><00:01:19.970><c>first </c><00:01:20.236><c>one</c> 00:01:20.390 --> 00:01:20.400 align:start position:0% . Okay, this is the first one 00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:22.830 align:start position:0% . Okay, this is the first one . <00:01:20.573><c>Most </c><00:01:20.746><c>of </c><00:01:20.919><c>the </c><00:01:21.092><c>campaigns </c><00:01:21.265><c>with </c><00:01:21.438><c>excellent </c><00:01:21.611><c>advertising </c><00:01:21.784><c>performance </c><00:01:21.957><c>are </c><00:01:22.130><c>the </c><00:01:22.303><c>ones </c><00:01:22.476><c>where</c> 00:01:22.830 --> 00:01:22.840 align:start position:0% . Most of the campaigns with excellent advertising performance are the ones where 00:01:22.840 --> 00:01:25.270 align:start position:0% . Most of the campaigns with excellent advertising performance are the ones where I 00:01:25.270 --> 00:01:25.280 align:start position:0% I 00:01:25.280 --> 00:01:27.149 align:start position:0% I incorporated <00:01:25.610><c>interests. </c><00:01:25.940><c>As </c><00:01:26.270><c>for </c><00:01:26.600><c>interest-</c> 00:01:27.149 --> 00:01:27.159 align:start position:0% incorporated interests. As for interest- 00:01:27.159 --> 00:01:29.190 align:start position:0% incorporated interests. As for interest- based <00:01:27.326><c>non-targeting, </c><00:01:27.493><c>this </c><00:01:27.660><c>is... </c><00:01:27.827><c>You </c><00:01:27.994><c>only </c><00:01:28.161><c>do </c><00:01:28.328><c>this </c><00:01:28.495><c>when </c><00:01:28.662><c>you're </c><00:01:28.829><c>a </c><00:01:28.996><c>beginner</c> 00:01:29.190 --> 00:01:29.200 align:start position:0% based non-targeting, this is... You only do this when you're a beginner 00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:31.390 align:start position:0% based non-targeting, this is... You only do this when you're a beginner . <00:01:29.336><c>I </c><00:01:29.472><c>only </c><00:01:29.608><c>run </c><00:01:29.744><c>Meta </c><00:01:29.880><c>ads </c><00:01:30.016><c>when </c><00:01:30.152><c>I'm </c><00:01:30.288><c>a </c><00:01:30.424><c>beginner </c><00:01:30.560><c>with </c><00:01:30.696><c>no </c><00:01:30.832><c>data;</c> 00:01:31.390 --> 00:01:31.400 align:start position:0% . I only run Meta ads when I'm a beginner with no data; 00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:33.749 align:start position:0% . I only run Meta ads when I'm a beginner with no data; later <00:01:33.040><c>on,</c> 00:01:33.749 --> 00:01:35.389 align:start position:0% later on, 00:01:35.389 --> 00:01:35.399 align:start position:0% 00:01:35.399 --> 00:01:36.950 align:start position:0% how <00:01:35.512><c>do </c><00:01:35.625><c>real </c><00:01:35.738><c>experts </c><00:01:35.851><c>hit </c><00:01:35.964><c>2,000% </c><00:01:36.077><c>or </c><00:01:36.190><c>3,000% </c><00:01:36.303><c>ROAS? </c><00:01:36.416><c>It </c><00:01:36.529><c>is </c><00:01:36.642><c>one </c><00:01:36.755><c>of</c> 00:01:36.950 --> 00:01:36.960 align:start position:0% how do real experts hit 2,000% or 3,000% ROAS? It is one of 00:01:36.960 --> 00:01:38.590 align:start position:0% how do real experts hit 2,000% or 3,000% ROAS? It is one of various <00:01:37.111><c>targeting </c><00:01:37.262><c>techniques, </c><00:01:37.413><c>specifically </c><00:01:37.564><c>retargeting </c><00:01:37.715><c>ads </c><00:01:37.866><c>that </c><00:01:38.017><c>are </c><00:01:38.168><c>sent </c><00:01:38.319><c>to</c> 00:01:38.590 --> 00:01:38.600 align:start position:0% various targeting techniques, specifically retargeting ads that are sent to 00:01:38.600 --> 00:01:42.149 align:start position:0% various targeting techniques, specifically retargeting ads that are sent to people <00:01:39.088><c>who </c><00:01:39.576><c>have </c><00:01:40.064><c>visited </c><00:01:40.552><c>my </c><00:01:41.040><c>homepage</c> 00:01:42.149 --> 00:01:42.159 align:start position:0% people who have visited my homepage 00:01:42.159 --> 00:01:44.510 align:start position:0% people who have visited my homepage . <00:01:44.320><c>Now,</c> 00:01:44.510 --> 00:01:44.520 align:start position:0% . Now, 00:01:44.520 --> 00:01:45.789 align:start position:0% . Now, secondly, 00:01:45.789 --> 00:01:45.799 align:start position:0% secondly, 00:01:45.799 --> 00:01:47.749 align:start position:0% secondly, offline <00:01:45.919><c>options </c><00:01:46.039><c>are </c><00:01:46.159><c>also </c><00:01:46.279><c>available </c><00:01:46.399><c>even </c><00:01:46.519><c>without </c><00:01:46.639><c>a </c><00:01:46.759><c>website. </c><00:01:46.879><c>You </c><00:01:46.999><c>can</c> 00:01:47.749 --> 00:01:47.759 align:start position:0% offline options are also available even without a website. You can 00:01:47.759 --> 00:01:50.190 align:start position:0% offline options are also available even without a website. You can target <00:01:47.983><c>that </c><00:01:48.207><c>person's </c><00:01:48.431><c>cell </c><00:01:48.655><c>phone </c><00:01:48.879><c>just </c><00:01:49.103><c>by </c><00:01:49.327><c>knowing </c><00:01:49.551><c>their </c><00:01:49.775><c>phone </c><00:01:49.999><c>number</c> 00:01:50.190 --> 00:01:50.200 align:start position:0% target that person's cell phone just by knowing their phone number 00:01:50.200 --> 00:01:51.990 align:start position:0% target that person's cell phone just by knowing their phone number . 00:01:51.990 --> 00:01:52.000 align:start position:0% . 00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:54.469 align:start position:0% . It's <00:01:52.126><c>Instagram </c><00:01:52.252><c>account </c><00:01:52.378><c>targeting. </c><00:01:52.504><c>I </c><00:01:52.630><c>can </c><00:01:52.756><c>target </c><00:01:52.882><c>and </c><00:01:53.008><c>shoot </c><00:01:53.134><c>ads </c><00:01:53.260><c>to </c><00:01:53.386><c>people </c><00:01:53.512><c>who </c><00:01:53.638><c>have</c> 00:01:54.469 --> 00:01:54.479 align:start position:0% It's Instagram account targeting. I can target and shoot ads to people who have 00:01:54.479 --> 00:01:56.270 align:start position:0% It's Instagram account targeting. I can target and shoot ads to people who have visited <00:01:54.705><c>my </c><00:01:54.931><c>profile </c><00:01:55.157><c>or </c><00:01:55.383><c>have </c><00:01:55.609><c>posted </c><00:01:55.835><c>on</c> 00:01:56.270 --> 00:01:56.280 align:start position:0% visited my profile or have posted on 00:01:56.280 --> 00:01:58.109 align:start position:0% visited my profile or have posted on Jodaegong, <00:01:56.493><c>even </c><00:01:56.706><c>if </c><00:01:56.919><c>they </c><00:01:57.132><c>haven't </c><00:01:57.345><c>followed </c><00:01:57.558><c>me</c> 00:01:58.109 --> 00:01:59.429 align:start position:0% Jodaegong, even if they haven't followed me 00:01:59.429 --> 00:01:59.439 align:start position:0% 00:01:59.439 --> 00:02:00.910 align:start position:0% . <00:01:59.709><c>The </c><00:01:59.979><c>results </c><00:02:00.249><c>were </c><00:02:00.519><c>very</c> 00:02:00.910 --> 00:02:00.920 align:start position:0% . The results were very 00:02:00.920 --> 00:02:03.590 align:start position:0% . The results were very good. <00:02:01.031><c>Try </c><00:02:01.142><c>to </c><00:02:01.253><c>find </c><00:02:01.364><c>another </c><00:02:01.475><c>person </c><00:02:01.586><c>who </c><00:02:01.697><c>has </c><00:02:01.808><c>the </c><00:02:01.919><c>same </c><00:02:02.030><c>behavioral </c><00:02:02.141><c>patterns </c><00:02:02.252><c>as </c><00:02:02.363><c>the </c><00:02:02.474><c>person </c><00:02:02.585><c>who </c><00:02:02.696><c>bought </c><00:02:02.807><c>my </c><00:02:02.918><c>item</c> 00:02:03.590 --> 00:02:06.590 align:start position:0% good. Try to find another person who has the same behavioral patterns as the person who bought my item 00:02:06.590 --> 00:02:06.600 align:start position:0% 00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:09.719 align:start position:0% .